Blog Layout

A Game Changer for Tackling the Living Wage Gap — Globally

May 16, 2024

Fiona Dragstra, General Director of the WageIndicator Foundation, shares how the NGO is providing updated, publicly accessible living wage estimates across 166 countries. Working with trade unions, employers, companies, and other living-wage stakeholders around the world, WageIndicator is helping to close the living wage gap globally.



Though the concept of a “living wage” dates back to 1919 when the preamble of the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO’s) Constitution called for “the provision of an adequate living wage,” it has taken almost a century for this movement to gather true momentum. The ILO’s adoption of principles on estimating living wages in March 2024, gives new wings to those who have long advocated for progress on this issue.


The rising cost-of-living across the world has deepened wealth inequality globally. According to the Business Council to Tackle Inequality, the top 10% of earners take home over half of total global pay, while the bottom 50% earn just 8.5% of that pie. In many economies that contribute massively to global supply chains, large numbers of workers live in poverty: 58% in Mozambique, 37% in India, 33% in Mexico, and in Europe one-in-ten is at risk. The payment of fair compensation can spark virtuous cycles that benefit workers, businesses and, subsequently, society at large, giving rise to stable, resilient, reliable, and better performing value chains and sustainable business practices.


Growing recognition that statutory minimum wages often fail to cover peoples’ basic needs has bolstered increasing support for the living wage movement. According to WageIndicator’s April 2024 data, in only 26 countries the lowest applicable statutory minimum wage was equal to or exceeded our living wage estimates.

WageIndicator.org – Minimum Wage – Living Wage gap across 166 countries worldwide, April 2024.


Scaling living wage estimates globally


At WageIndicator Foundation we have worked on living wages for over a decade. This was a logical step after creating globally comparable databases on Minimum Wages, Wages and Salaries, Labour Laws, and Collective Agreements, all aimed at enabling global labour market transparency through publicly available data resources. Our first living wage release in 2014 provided contextualised living wage data for 80 countries; our latest release in April 2024 provides regional level data for 2700+ regions across 166 countries.


We calculate living wages by estimating the costs of goods and services needed by workers and their families for a decent standard of living, contextualised for regional socio-economic realities. We devise estimates for a variety of family types and update our data on a quarterly basis through face-to-face and online data collection by some 300 data collectors across the world. We welcome the principles as set out by the ILO Governing Body, noting the importance of strengthening social dialogue and collective bargaining in operationalising the living wage, as well as promoting incremental progression from minimum wages to living wages.

 

Living wages as a linking pin in the SDGs


The living wage movement has not been solely driven by advocacy from NGOs and trade unions, nor by goodwill gestures from companies. Instead, it has emerged at the forefront of global agendas around sustainable business. Crucially, paying a living wage can be a linking pin for several of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Though they most directly link to SDG 8 (Decent work and Economic growth), SDG 1 (No poverty), and SDG 10 (Reduced inequalities), they are also contributory to SDG 2 (Zero hunger), SDG 3 (Good health and well-being), SDG 4 (Quality education), SDG 5 (Gender equality), and SDG 16 (Peace, justice, and strong institutions).


The significance of a living wage in advancing these goals underscores its integral role in enabling sustainable development and social progress. The UN Global Compact’s Faster Forward initiative highlights living wages as one of the five key ‘areas of action’ for corporate responsibility. Guiding businesses in aligning their strategies and operations with the universal principles of a living wage, gender equality, climate action, water security, and sustainable finance, the Faster Forward initiative supports integrating living wage policies throughout an organization's workforce as well as its supply chain.


This is similarly emphasized by sustainability reporting requirements imposed by recent and upcoming legislation such as the European Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). These regulations compel companies to disclose their social impact and ensure due diligence for human and environmental right violations across their supply chains, including efforts to ensure fair and adequate wages. By fostering transparency and accountability, such measures contribute to the broader aim of promoting corporate responsibility and ethical business practices.

 

How are companies and investors responding to these developments?


Companies, for their part, are increasingly committed to paying a living wage. And they are increasingly communicating that commitment publicly. PwC and WageIndicator’s Global Living Wage Survey 2023 found that 67% of businesses considered living wages a priority for their organisation and that 54% expected to make relevant commitments within the next five years.


Companies such as Fairphone have emerged as leaders in this movement, making ambitious and public commitments to the cause. Unilever, as well, made its first Framework for Fair Compensation in 2014, pledging to pay all its employees a living wage. And they expanded this ambition across their entire supply chain, aiming to require all their suppliers to pay their workers a living wage by 2030.


Ball Horticulture, a family company that works with over 8,000 individuals across over 30 regions globally, is another powerful example of putting these data in positive change. Unsure if their compensation policies met decent living standards, they approached WageIndicator in 2021. Ball Horticulture now uses WageIndicator’s Living Wage database to drive living wage commitments across their entire supply chain. After surveying 30 locations and identifying wage gaps in nine geographic areas, they have already implemented living wage policies in two regions and have devised action plans to accomplish the same for the rest. Using WageIndicator's living wage estimates, they negotiated with supply chain managers reluctant to pay more than minimum wage, showcasing the measurable negative impacts of inadequate compensation. While they're still addressing second-order effects like wage structure revisions and cost impacts, they are optimistic that improved wages will reduce attrition, cutting hiring and training costs. They believe retaining experienced workers will ultimately benefit consumers with better products and higher quality services.


Living wages are also gaining prominence in the investment landscape, as recently highlighted by the Swedish Buffer Fund, AP2. Their analysis indicates that while addressing social issues might seem challenging, the concept of living wages provides a clear and quantifiable metric, making it easier to track and enable effective policies and progress. Incorporating living wages into their investing approach allows them to engage with companies on human rights and supply chain issues, regardless of their geographical location. For them, paying a living wage is crucial for evaluating true company performance and ensuring fair competition across markets. As it should be for all.


Publicly available living wage estimates


The challenges associated with living wage commitments and implementation should not be underestimated. Many companies that started working on living wage implementation in their supply chains encountered the difficulty of having access to publicly available, consistently updated and regional living wage estimates at scale.


At WageIndicator, we made a first step to address this issue and therefore as of 1 May 2024, we have published our living wage estimates for over 2700 regions across 166 countries. We make these data publicly accessible to all, in the hope that the availability of updated estimates can empower wage negotiations and collective bargaining globally — facilitating the implementation of living wages everywhere.


In addition to making these living wage estimates publicly accessible, we continue our work together with trade unions, employers, companies, and other stakeholders in the living wage movement to demystify living wages. Of course, we would not be WageIndicator if our aim was not to continue to expand and maintain our living wage database — to ensure that these data remain publicly available, enabling equal access to this vital information for all.

About the Author:

Fiona Dragstra,

General Director, WageIndicator Foundation


PHOTO: Garments Factory, Bangkok | 1000 Words, Shutterstock | WageIndicator

Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

By Mathis Wackernagel, PhD 19 Sep, 2024
Mathis Wackernagel, PhD, Co-founder of the Global Footprint Network and an ISSP Hall of Fame Honoree, offers a cogent account of the largest pyramid scheme ever: global overshoot of our planet’s regenerative capacity by at least 70%.
By Desta Raines 15 Aug, 2024
Desta Raines , Governing Board Secretary at ISSP and Board Member at Pact Collective, reveals how strong, enduring multisector partnerships in sustainability need to be carefully crafted and mutually beneficial. And sometimes they need to start slowly to be able to eventually move fast and at scale. When I started my new job in the fall of 2020, one of the first assignments I was given was to figure out how to launch a consumer-facing empties take-back program across all our stores in North America. The program would allow consumers to dispose of their beauty product packaging at dedicated in-store stations to help divert it from landfills. It was a CEO priority that needed to happen. For me, the question was how? I met with the CEO and got his thoughts. His response: consumer surveys, pilot, get into the field to see what customers and store employees thought and wanted. Sounded great! But I needed a solid game plan to get this done. I started mapping out the logistics, talking to people inside and outside of the company, trying to understand the organization culture, our market positioning, how things worked. I tried to wrap my head around the best way to approach this idea. I knew it was critically important to produce a failsafe plan. After all, this would be a highly visible program and one where I would need robust inside support to execute. As I often say when describing our company's sustainability initiatives — and it's an apt metaphor — I am the conductor, and the rest of the organization is the orchestra. There cannot be a concert unless we all play our instruments. Attuning to start As I started pulling together my plans and mapping my strategy, something still was not feeling right to me. I was thinking about the challenge and considering that while we could develop an initiative to ensure at least a certain degree of impact, what would be the most meaningful thing we could do? As I was pondering, we were approached by the co-founder of Pact Collective , which proposed an idea that I was seeking deep down. Essentially: become the first prestige beauty retailer to join Pact Collective and lead the way in eliminating packaging waste from the beauty and wellness industries. I was elated with this possibility. It felt like winning the lottery. Though I knew I still needed to dig deeper — engage the organization and, most importantly, make sure the CEO was onboard. Once I confirmed that our leadership and our talent were enthusiastic toward this potential collaboration, I had to make sure Pact Collective was a partner we could rely upon fully. I knew that once we started down the path, we would not have the option to turn back. Finding the right harmony When a corporation is seeking nonprofit partners to execute sustainability programs, it is important to have a clear vision of what you want to create and to ensure mission alignment across the partnering organizations. Roles and expectations need to be clearly defined, which involves considerable discussion. Over the course of my career, I have seen successful corporate - NGO partnerships and many that have failed. Reasons for failure can range from insufficient capacity at the NGO to support at-scale deployment, to inadequate prioritization and budget within the corporation's strategic planning. From the standpoint of the NGO specifically, they need long-term partners to scale impact — and not to be used as shields against corporate reputational risk. How the concert progressed In the case of Pact Collective, we had many conversations, knowing that an eventual partnership with them would exponentially multiply their drop-off bin locations. We did a lot of scenario planning before we even circled back to our CEO. With time, I was confident that we had worked out the mechanics of a mutually beneficial relationship that had the potential to be industry changing. Our CEO agreed. Focusing on a sector-wide issue, such as packaging waste in the beauty and wellness industries — and engaging consumers to be able to scale our initiative — made a lot of sense for us. The idea of being part of a group of companies, including brands we retailed, and working together to solve a common issue made it even more appealing. We hoped that by putting this stake in the ground we could serve as a catalyst for positive change across our industry. Personally, I loved that Pact Collective focused on consumer action to bring back clean, empty packaging that otherwise would not be accepted by community recycling programs. Scaling this initiative involved effective communication across our consumer audiences, educating them on how to do it and why it mattered. And it involved providing bins across all our retail locations and training our employees to facilitate both consumer engagement and the recycling process. The music continues The success of our partnership with Pact Collective has created momentum for other sustainability initiatives at our company. Not only did our empties take-back initiative generate executive-level visibility, but it also drew attention across the whole organization. Working across multiple teams on an ongoing basis has built lasting relationships — relationships that have furthered subsequent sustainability initiatives. I see now that our empties take-back program has served as the trunk of a tree from which sustainability branches can more easily sprout and grow. Reflecting on this approach, I realize that it just takes one successful sustainability win to start the show. While the music may not play as fast as you want it to, it can build tempo over time. As sustainability practitioners, we can feel a sense of urgency — the climate is changing fast, people! — yet often lack the time, resources, support, motivation, or momentum to move quickly. Realizing that we can move slowly to move fast is one of the best lessons I have learned. Today the Pact Collective program has stood the test of time, and the partnership continues to thrive. More companies and brands have joined, and I have had the honor to serve on its Board of Directors. Creating a strong and lasting partnership builds the case for more and illustrates that these relationships work well when carefully crafted and mutually beneficial.
IFRS Sustainability Reporting
By Richard Barker, PhD 18 Jul, 2024
Richard Barker, PhD, of the International Sustainability Standards Board and Professor, University of Oxford's Saïd Business School, recounts the rise in sustainability reporting.
More blog posts
Share by: