A Super Year for Nature, and the Policy Stakes Could Not Be Higher

Fabian Sack, PhD, SEP

This year starts the United Nations Decade of Ecosystem Restoration. It also sees meetings of two of the three Conventions arising from the Rio Earth Summit almost three decades ago, making it a ‘Super Year for Nature’¹. Although the Conventions on climate change, biodiversity and desertification have different individual aims, they share common goals around protecting the environment and the unique ecosystems which make up this planet.


Climate change, loss of biodiversity and increasing desertification are inevitable results of the ways of life many of us have enjoyed for a generation or two and which are increasingly being aspired to around the world. It is progressively harder to ignore that a fossil-fueled, resource-hungry global economy is not a realistic future scenario — it is literally consuming the Earth and its diversity of life.

Despite any appearances to the contrary, for most of us in Australia the interrelation of climate change, loss of biodiversity and increasing desertification is now obvious and accepted. A reputable national survey last year showed that only one in ten Australians denied that climate change was occurring. More than three in four Australians were concerned about climate change driving bushfire, drought, reducing food supply, destroying our reefs, creating weather, raising the sea level, and causing mass extinctions.


But, as in so many countries, our institutions have not to date given effective expression to this collective concern, casting this as a matter of individual choice, despite the results being experienced by all. Policy change has been far too slow, and without policy leadership business responses, where these are credible, are likely to lead to further disruptive transitions, impacting the most vulnerable and further eviscerating social cohesion that might foster a civil society capable of addressing our common future.

This super year for nature gives some hope that coordinated national and international policy leadership may be possible. In the lead up to CoP 26 in Glasgow in November, global focus on responding to climate change has sharpened (as our Australian Prime Minster is experiencing), and now countries are expected to agree on a Post-2020 Global Framework for Biodiversity and new targets for protecting biodiversity at October’s UN Convention on Biological Diversity in Kunming, China. Business is expected to play a new and expanded role in implementing key outcomes on biodiversity, as has been the case with climate change.


In my work on the ground, building capacity to respond to the risks of climate change and to forge a more sustainable future, I see slow but growing recognition of the importance of our relationship with nature in policy and practice. In the face of the economic and social consequences of fire, drought, and ecosystems collapse, some of our most recent policy frameworks are acknowledging that the environmentally attuned values and culture of First Nations people can build resilience. Policy makers are very slowly adopting a social-ecological systems approach and are little by little acknowledging the fundamental importance of biological diversity. These are still by no means the policy mainstream, but there is vocal support from some parts of the business community, notably the finance sector, as sustainability risks are being internalised. This chorus echoes themes long-championed by local governments and their affiliations, as well as the enduring efforts of the not-for-profit community.


Global progress on biodiversity would give excellent momentum to the UN Climate Change Conference. Success in both these areas will hopefully provide some impetus for action on desertification and so for action on food and water security. Only if substantial and coordinated action in all these three areas can be achieved will we have some chance of achieving the ambitious targets of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.


¹The CoP of the least well-known of the three Conventions, the UN Convention to Combat Desertification, was also to have been held this year but has been postponed due to Covid.


Photo: Kaique Andrades on Pexels


About the Author:

Fabian Sack, PhD, SEP
Director, Sustainably Pty Ltd
ISSP Governing Board

Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

By By Elizabeth Dinschel & Bangaly Kourouma January 16, 2026
January 16, 2026 At the International Society of Sustainability Professionals (ISSP), strategy is not theoretical. It is practical, action-oriented, and grounded in the real needs of sustainability professionals working in complex and rapidly evolving environments. The ISSP 2026 Strategic Plan is a one-year, execution-focused roadmap designed to strengthen ISSP’s role as a global professional association for sustainability practitioners. Built directly from member feedback gathered through Town Halls, surveys, and ongoing conversations, the plan focuses on three strategic priorities: financial stability, relevant professional knowledge, and meaningful member engagement. This article explains what the 2026 Strategic Plan is, why these priorities matter, and how member input directly shaped ISSP’s direction. What the ISSP 2026 Strategic Plan Is—and Is Not The 2026 Strategic Plan is not a long-term vision statement or a five-year forecast. It is a focused, one-year plan designed to deliver measurable progress. The plan is intended to: Strengthen ISSP’s financial sustainability Modernize sustainability education and credential resources Improve the member experience across career stages Each priority includes defined actions, timelines, and success metrics, ensuring accountability and transparency.
Paper cut-out figures holding hands in a chain against a dark blue background.
By Elizabeth Dinschel, December 18, 2025 December 18, 2025
Elizabeth Dinschel, MA, MBA, is the Executive Director of ISSP Earlier this month, we hosted our first global ISSP Town Hall since I stepped into the role of Executive Director. I logged off that call energized, humbled, and deeply grateful for the honesty, generosity, and care that our members brought into the space. This Town Hall was never meant to be a one-way update. It was designed as a listening session — a chance for ISSP leadership and staff to hear directly from sustainability professionals across regions, sectors, and career stages. And you delivered. What follows are a few reflections on what I heard, what we learned, and where we’re headed next together. Why We Called This Town Hall ISSP has gone through a period of transition — new leadership, new staff, and a renewed focus on modernizing how we serve a truly global membership. Change can be energizing, but it can also create moments of uncertainty and disconnection. We knew we needed to pause, gather our community, and listen with intention. The Town Hall brought together members from multiple continents, industries, and disciplines. Sustainability practitioners, consultants, engineers, communicators, policy professionals, and career-transitioners all showed up with thoughtful questions and candid feedback. One thing was immediately clear: this community cares deeply about its work, about each other, and about ISSP’s role in supporting sustainability professionals at a challenging moment for the field.
Can sustainability be saved by tackling loneliness, not just CO₂ emissions?
By Raz Godelnik, Associate Professor November 20, 2025
Raz Godelnik is an Associate Professor of Strategic Design and Management at Parsons School of Design — The New School. He is the author of Rethinking Corporate Sustainability in the Era of Climate Crisis . You can follow him on LinkedIn .  Can sustainability be saved by tackling loneliness, not just CO₂ emissions? Earlier this month, I stopped at Sunshine Coffee in Laramie, Wyoming, on our way to Yellowstone Park. What brought me there was the fact that it’s a zero-waste coffee shop, with no single-use consumer items. In other words, there are no disposable cups — not for customers dining in, and not even for those who want their coffee to go, like I did. Instead, you can either bring your own reusable cup or get your drink in a glass jar for $1, which is refunded on your next order when you return it (or you can simply keep it, as I did). At first, I was excited about the zero-waste coffee shop concept, wondering what it would take for Starbucks and other coffee chains to adopt it and eliminate the waste that has become an integral part of our coffee (and other drinks) consumption. But as I waited for my coffee, I began to notice something else — something that had little to do with waste and everything to do with people. As I looked around, I noticed their stickers. Beneath the logo, it read: Zero waste. Community space . Suddenly it clicked — this coffee shop isn’t just about eliminating waste; it’s about creating a place where people feel connected. As owner and founder of Sunshine Coffee, Megan Johnson, explained in an interview with This is Laramie : “I wanted to bring sustainable values to Wyoming as well as build a business that serves the community.” That got me thinking about how the second part — serving the community — is integral to the first. After all, in a world where loneliness — a key barrier to people’s well-being — is on the rise, shouldn’t creating spaces for connection be just as central to sustainability as going zero waste?
More blog posts