Emotional, Rational, and Artificial Intelligence for a Sustainable World

Marco Tedesco, PhD

Marco Tedesco, PhD, Lamont Research Professor at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and Climate School, reflects on the importance of emotional intelligence in sustainability. He advises a balance of emotional, rational, and artificial intelligence for a sustainable world.



Emotional intelligence should play a larger role in our choices.


Artificial intelligence is not the solution to all problems.


Sustainability approaches using a balanced combination of AI, EI, and RI are likely to be the most successful.


How do we define intelligence? Are humans more intelligent than other creatures? These are questions I often ask myself, especially when I think of climate change, sustainability, and the impact of humans on our planet. 


It is true that humans possess a unique set of cognitive abilities that are not found in other animals, such as language, abstract reasoning, planning, and problem-solving. It is also true, however, that when it comes to skills such as sensory perception and some forms of problem-solving, other animals may outperform humans. This is not only true when it comes to physical sensory skills—for example, think of birds who can navigate thousands of miles across oceans without getting lost—but also from an emotional and planning perspective. For example, many species would never deploy all the resources within their habitat knowing that this might lead them to extinction, as humans do.  See the latest book by Ed Yong, An Immense World: How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us.


Rational and emotional intelligence are two types of intelligence that have been studied extensively. Rational intelligence refers to the ability to think logically, solve problems, and make decisions based on facts or evidence. Emotional intelligence, on the other hand, is the ability to understand and manage one's own emotions as well as the emotions of others. If it is true that rational intelligence is often measured and represents a benchmark to define the “quality” of an individual, emotional intelligence has not been valued as important as rational intelligence, nor tools to properly measure it have gained popular consensus. 


Recently, to further extend rational and emotional intelligence, humans have created and are proud of the development of artificial intelligence, also known as AI, and defined as “the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and translation between languages.” So, it all goes back to human intelligence. Again! 


The intersection between sustainability and AI is an area of growing interest as organizations and governments seek to use such tools to strengthen sustainability through reducing carbon emissions, optimizing energy consumption, improving waste management, and enhancing resource efficiency, to name a few examples. We need, however, to remember that AI feeds on human intelligence and, very importantly, human intentions. The “black box” nature of many AI applications makes it particularly suited to introducing biases or manipulating information towards or against, for example, specific racial or social groups. As AI systems are designed and trained by humans, they can reflect existing biases and prejudices. If these biases are not addressed, AI could perpetuate and amplify social and economic inequalities. A democratic AI ecosystem is paramount for a just, sustainable society. 


This is where emotional intelligence (EI) can play a role. EI is often overlooked in discussions of sustainability, which tend solely to focus on technical solutions and policies. However, EI promotes the creation and growth of strong interpersonal connections, effective collaborations, and can help making decisions that benefit both people and the planet in an unbiased way. 


One aspect of emotional intelligence that is poorly considered is empathy—the ability to understand and share the feelings of others. In the context of sustainability, empathy is critical for understanding the needs and perspectives of different stakeholders, especially of those who may be affected by environmental degradation or social inequality. By practicing empathy, individuals and communities can work together to find solutions that benefit everyone, rather than just a select few.


Self-awareness, the ability to recognize and understand one's own emotions, thoughts, and behaviors is also crucial to identifying and addressing one's own biases and assumptions, as well as to recognizing the impact of one's own actions on the environment and society. By cultivating self-awareness, individuals can become more responsible and conscious consumers, and can work to reduce their own environmental footprint.


Empathy and self-awareness also improve communication skills. Effective communication is essential for building trust and understanding among stakeholders as well as for collaboration and conflict resolution, which are necessary for overcoming obstacles and finding common ground. It is also important for being able to listen and communicate to those who are affected by environmental degradation or social inequality, which requires building relationships and engaging in dialogue with people from different backgrounds and perspectives. This allows for a deeper understanding of the challenges facing communities — communities that have the right to be empowered with the proper tools rather than told what to do in “their best interest.”


As we continue to pursue a more sustainable future, it is important to remember that the emotional and social aspects of sustainability are as important as the technical solutions and policies needing to be put in place. By harnessing the power of emotional intelligence, we can create a more just, equitable, and sustainable world for ourselves and future generations. This is as important as stopping the sea from rising!



About the Author:

Marco Tedesco, PhD
Lamont Research Professor
Columbia University Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and Climate School


PHOTO: Pxhere


Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

By By Elizabeth Dinschel & Bangaly Kourouma January 16, 2026
January 16, 2026 At the International Society of Sustainability Professionals (ISSP), strategy is not theoretical. It is practical, action-oriented, and grounded in the real needs of sustainability professionals working in complex and rapidly evolving environments. The ISSP 2026 Strategic Plan is a one-year, execution-focused roadmap designed to strengthen ISSP’s role as a global professional association for sustainability practitioners. Built directly from member feedback gathered through Town Halls, surveys, and ongoing conversations, the plan focuses on three strategic priorities: financial stability, relevant professional knowledge, and meaningful member engagement. This article explains what the 2026 Strategic Plan is, why these priorities matter, and how member input directly shaped ISSP’s direction. What the ISSP 2026 Strategic Plan Is—and Is Not The 2026 Strategic Plan is not a long-term vision statement or a five-year forecast. It is a focused, one-year plan designed to deliver measurable progress. The plan is intended to: Strengthen ISSP’s financial sustainability Modernize sustainability education and credential resources Improve the member experience across career stages Each priority includes defined actions, timelines, and success metrics, ensuring accountability and transparency.
Paper cut-out figures holding hands in a chain against a dark blue background.
By Elizabeth Dinschel, December 18, 2025 December 18, 2025
Elizabeth Dinschel, MA, MBA, is the Executive Director of ISSP Earlier this month, we hosted our first global ISSP Town Hall since I stepped into the role of Executive Director. I logged off that call energized, humbled, and deeply grateful for the honesty, generosity, and care that our members brought into the space. This Town Hall was never meant to be a one-way update. It was designed as a listening session — a chance for ISSP leadership and staff to hear directly from sustainability professionals across regions, sectors, and career stages. And you delivered. What follows are a few reflections on what I heard, what we learned, and where we’re headed next together. Why We Called This Town Hall ISSP has gone through a period of transition — new leadership, new staff, and a renewed focus on modernizing how we serve a truly global membership. Change can be energizing, but it can also create moments of uncertainty and disconnection. We knew we needed to pause, gather our community, and listen with intention. The Town Hall brought together members from multiple continents, industries, and disciplines. Sustainability practitioners, consultants, engineers, communicators, policy professionals, and career-transitioners all showed up with thoughtful questions and candid feedback. One thing was immediately clear: this community cares deeply about its work, about each other, and about ISSP’s role in supporting sustainability professionals at a challenging moment for the field.
Can sustainability be saved by tackling loneliness, not just CO₂ emissions?
By Raz Godelnik, Associate Professor November 20, 2025
Raz Godelnik is an Associate Professor of Strategic Design and Management at Parsons School of Design — The New School. He is the author of Rethinking Corporate Sustainability in the Era of Climate Crisis . You can follow him on LinkedIn .  Can sustainability be saved by tackling loneliness, not just CO₂ emissions? Earlier this month, I stopped at Sunshine Coffee in Laramie, Wyoming, on our way to Yellowstone Park. What brought me there was the fact that it’s a zero-waste coffee shop, with no single-use consumer items. In other words, there are no disposable cups — not for customers dining in, and not even for those who want their coffee to go, like I did. Instead, you can either bring your own reusable cup or get your drink in a glass jar for $1, which is refunded on your next order when you return it (or you can simply keep it, as I did). At first, I was excited about the zero-waste coffee shop concept, wondering what it would take for Starbucks and other coffee chains to adopt it and eliminate the waste that has become an integral part of our coffee (and other drinks) consumption. But as I waited for my coffee, I began to notice something else — something that had little to do with waste and everything to do with people. As I looked around, I noticed their stickers. Beneath the logo, it read: Zero waste. Community space . Suddenly it clicked — this coffee shop isn’t just about eliminating waste; it’s about creating a place where people feel connected. As owner and founder of Sunshine Coffee, Megan Johnson, explained in an interview with This is Laramie : “I wanted to bring sustainable values to Wyoming as well as build a business that serves the community.” That got me thinking about how the second part — serving the community — is integral to the first. After all, in a world where loneliness — a key barrier to people’s well-being — is on the rise, shouldn’t creating spaces for connection be just as central to sustainability as going zero waste?
More blog posts