Sub-Saharan African Sustainability – New Awareness and Generational Shifts

Bangaly Kourouma • June 17, 2024

Bangaly Kourouma, Information Systems Division Manager at Austin Energy and ISSP Governing Board Treasurer, shares the strategic opportunity of sustainability, scaled large to enable equitable economic development in sub-Saharan Africa. This goal is critical to both local populations and to balancing global interests.



Countries with mineral-rich soil are often among the least industrialized and poorest in the world, experiencing significant political and social instability. They also exhibit the highest population growth rates and enduring quasi-domination from developed nations that normalize exploitation as a model for success and stability. In this essay, I will discuss the non-negotiable aspirations, needs, and expectations of young Africans who are tired of promises and demand nothing less than a fair shot at the contemporary human experience.



Wealth and Stability for All?


Every modern human population seeks access to our basic amenities of contemporary life: clean water, electricity, infrastructure, modern education, economic stability, and environmental health. Sustainability attracts the attention of many around the globe, and particularly those in developing economies, with its promise to include all of humanity — irrespective of identity, economic means, or social status.


We share this planet with diverse species, flora and fauna, making Earth uniquely suited for human life. Sub-Saharan Africa harbors some of the most globally coveted natural capital, including mineral resources and raw commodities. With 42% of the world’s gold, 80%–90% of its chromium and platinum group metals, and 60% of its arable land in addition to vast timber resources, Africa — our second largest continent, covering about one-fifth of the Earth's total land surface — is by any measure indispensable to human sustainability. Despite this intrinsic wealth, local inhabitants — rightful custodians of their lands — often remain unaware of their environmental resources: the types, quantities, qualities, and potential utility of their natural capital. Meanwhile, foreign corporations and governments leverage this knowledge for their financial gain.



Leaping from Abidjan (Cote d’Ivoire) to New York (USA) – A Stark Difference


I am a native of Cote d’Ivoire, a former French colony that gained independence in 1960. My K-12 education provided little to no information of our immense mineral wealth and what it could accomplish. Instead, classroom emphasis was placed on studying industries producing finished products, all of which were beyond our economic capacity to replicate. I left Sub-Saharan Africa at 19 years old. During a decade of continued resource exploitation despite local challenges, my peers back home continued to confront ever-present social unrest, police brutality, inadequate and inconsistent education, and most unfortunately, a lack of opportunities after they achieved their educational targets. Conversely, I was fortunate to obtain advanced degrees in the U.S. and, pursuing my interests, began to make an impact in the professional world. For my elementary and high school peers, there seemed to be no opportunities available to an entire generation of Ivorians — stalled due to the conditions I just described.


Somehow in this complex socio-economic environment, foreign companies — aided by their countries’ military — were able to shield their raw commodity production and perpetuated inequality through unfair pricing structures and exploitation. Raw products, sold globally at highly profitable and locally prohibitive rates, were often returning to Africa to be sold with mark-ups that have been and continue to be unaffordable to most locals. Without adequate knowledge transfer, professional training, and economic resources, local populations remain dependent on foreign control — and vulnerable to fear-based contract negotiation tactics that resemble longstanding imperialist exploitations.



A Stubborn Imperial Past


These widespread post-colonial conditions across sub-Saharan Africa have not been without major consequences. Onslaught after onslaught to establish foreign-controlled political and economic systems have destabilized nations and their citizens in ways that are persistent to this day. Obliged to focus on basic survival needs, citizen voices are muted and local civic action thwarted. Education, training, health, evolving economic practices all take a backseat to subsistence living.


The result is that we face a dearth of employment offering a living wage. With some of the lowest income levels in the world — and its incumbent hunger — young people seek to emigrate to industrialized nations. Some young people view the possibility of more viable economic conditions to be worth risking their lives, confronting long treks through wilderness and the threats of thirst, hunger, armed smugglers, human trafficking, and unsound ocean-crossing vessels — all in the hope of a better future in one of the industrial nations.


The pernicious loss in this reality is the missed opportunity to further knowledge transfer and engender skill development in their native lands, necessary to any foundation of sustained industrialization for sub-Saharan Africa. This tragedy continues to set the course for explosive unrest among populations entrenched in poverty and dominated by foreign interests that control nearly all local resources for their own profit and interests. The situation parallels Britannica's definition of imperialism: “state policy, practice, or advocacy of extending power and dominion, especially by direct territorial acquisition or by gaining political and economic control of other areas. Because it always involves the use of power, whether military or economic or some subtler form, imperialism has often been considered morally reprehensible…”.



Knowledge can truly lead to sustainability


Sub-Saharan Africa's exponential population growth further necessitates sustainability planning and initiatives that would ensure diverse engagement, economic growth, and equitable wealth distribution across these societies. The continent's younger generations seek equitable distribution of wealth, enabled by sustainability practices. Yet, developing local policy and governance to advance these initiatives holds its own set of challenges. Technological advancements and contemporary knowledge and social systems challenge traditional narratives, necessitating concrete benefits for local leaders. An equitable sustainability conversation begins with equitable access to information and recognition of key stakeholders' impact and contribution. Equitable exploitation of these resources is not achievable without an ecosystem by and for natives that can drive endogenous innovations and the entrepreneurial engine. Controlled competition where natives are given tax advantages and aided until successful is a requirement. Enabling robust, independent governing institutions that lead their efforts with targeted regulations, investments, and local labor training that serve local interests. This requires Stable governmental and political systems underpin this possibility and mitigate the risks of destabilizing mass social unrest.


Additionally, current geopolitical unrest outside Africa is closely observed as expansion of military conflicts represent a major risk to Sub-Saharan Africa. It is a global region that still lacks weapons of mass dissuasion such as nuclear arsenals, advanced endogenous military technologies, the ability to impose economic sanctions, etc.

 

The continent’s millennial and younger generations are now studying several models for prosperity, success, and stability. In discussion with my peers and other locals, the consistent theme is a desire is to achieve long-lasting peace and stability, equitable distribution of wealth, and competitive ingenuity and innovation. Yet, that possibility rests now on their shoulders. As such, sustainability offers them a set of tools and practices especially suited to this next wave of sub-Saharan leaders. Diaspora members, like myself, offer experience and guidance to accelerate these outcomes, contributing to capacity building for sustainable development while balancing outcomes for humanity's benefit.

About the Author:

Bangaly Kourouma
Information Systems Division Manager at Austin Energy
ISSP Governing Board Treasurer


PHOTO: Bangaly Kourouma | Parc Urbain Dominique Ouattara | Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire

Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

By Ioannis Ioannou, PhD June 19, 2025
London Business School Professor Ioannis Ioannou, PhD examines the vulnerable narrative infrastructure surrounding ESG. By collaboratively engaging those most affected by ESG transitions—indigenous peoples, workers, young people, small businesses, and communities, particularly in the Global South—we can foster the trust, legitimacy, and collective commitment for meaningful progress. Who Gets to Tell the Story of ESG? For more than a decade, ESG rapidly evolved from a specialized investor consideration into an elaborate global infrastructure of standards, metrics, taxonomies, and disclosure frameworks. Investor attention soared, corporate sustainability teams grew exponentially, and ESG vocabulary— climate risk, fiduciary duty, and double materiality—became firmly embedded in corporate boardrooms and regulatory discussions globally. Yet, despite ESG’s impressive institutional and technical advancements, the narrative meant to support it remained remarkably fragile. While ESG developed sophisticated standards, disclosures, and metrics, it never invested in the narrative infrastructure to explain its purpose, build public understanding, or secure legitimacy beyond institutional circles. Without the broader stakeholder engagement and effective storytelling that would connect ESG to people’s lived realities, it became vulnerable. Critics didn’t need to challenge carbon accounting or materiality frameworks; instead, they recast ESG as a job killer, an elite agenda, or an unwelcome intrusion into everyday life. The backlash caught many ESG professionals off guard, though the warning signs were visible. ESG’s rapid adoption by investors and regulatory bodies created an illusion of momentum, but this obscured a deeper structural gap. ESG rarely connected meaningfully with those directly affected by ESG-driven transitions—workers facing disruption, small business owners adapting to shifting expectations, and communities, particularly in vulnerable regions, confronting real and immediate climate risks. For these groups, ESG often seemed abstract, distant, and disconnected from their daily concerns. Narrative infrastructure might sound like an unusual concept, but it's foundational to widespread support. It connects people and institutions, conveys meaning, and determines whether ESG is seen as genuine leadership or merely corporate branding. Robust narrative infrastructure ensures resilience under political pressure; without it, initiatives can rapidly lose whatever public approval they may have had. Constructing narrative infrastructure requires explicitly recognizing storytelling— and who contributes to that storytelling—as integral to ESG strategy, not simply a communications exercise. Effective narratives generate trust precisely because they emerge from transparent dialogue, clear accountability, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. By contrast, greenwashing uses storytelling deceptively, aiming to conceal poor performance, and deflect scrutiny. Strong narrative infrastructure, unlike greenwashing, strengthens credibility and legitimacy by openly connecting ESG commitments to shared realities, tangible actions, and measurable outcomes. It is a fundamental strategic asset for ESG success. Importantly, narrative infrastructure also concerns who gets to tell these stories. Over the last decade, the central narrators of the ESG story have largely been institutional actors: executives, investors, sustainability professionals, academics, and regulators. Their contributions have been invaluable, driven by expertise, rigor, and genuine commitment. Yet these narrators also represent a relatively narrow perspective, shaped by institutional backgrounds and professional incentives. Many important voices have remained largely excluded from shaping ESG narratives: indigenous people whose lives are often fundamentally changed by corporate activities, workers whose livelihoods are directly impacted by ESG transitions, young people deeply invested in future outcomes, small businesses continuously adapting to new ESG-related requirements, and especially communities—particularly in the Global South —directly facing the worst of climate disruptions. While these stakeholders' experiences occasionally appear within ESG reporting, they seldom influenced strategy or shape decisions in a substantial way. This exclusion poses significant, practical risks. Stakeholders naturally resist initiatives perceived as imposed from above or disconnected from their lived realities—not necessarily because they oppose ESG’s goals, but because they feel unheard and invisible within such ESG narratives. The resistance appears as political backlash, active public scepticism, or disengagement, all severely undermining ESG’s legitimacy, effectiveness, and public support. Addressing this critical weakness requires deliberately building ESG’s narrative infrastructure through inclusive, collaborative, and ongoing engagement. Practically, companies should move beyond occasional or reactive consultations toward sustained processes where stakeholders actively shape strategies. This can involve establishing community advisory boards with real decision-making power, participatory scenario planning that integrates diverse local perspectives, and internal cross-functional councils that ensure workers, communities, and youth voices directly influence ESG outcomes. Such sustained, authentic collaboration bridges the gap between institutional intentions and genuine public legitimacy. Within companies, narrative stewardship should not be limited to corporate communications or sustainability departments alone. Effective ESG storytelling depends on regular, structured collaboration across multiple functions—including strategy, human resources, procurement, product development, and finance—to ensure ESG commitments align authentically with core business decisions and reflect real-world stakeholder experiences. Companies can institutionalize this collaboration by creating dedicated cross-functional ESG committees tasked with integrating diverse internal perspectives, monitoring stakeholder feedback, and ensuring ESG initiatives clearly connect to tangible social outcomes. At an institutional level, building ESG narrative infrastructure involves establishing platforms that broaden participation in ESG discourse. It requires supporting initiatives that improve public understanding of ESG standards and practices, funding research that evaluates public perceptions of ESG alongside traditional financial metrics and ensuring ESG disclosures transparently reflect diverse stakeholder concerns. ESG narrative legitimacy grows stronger when diverse perspectives genuinely shape how ESG commitments are determined and communicated, implemented, and monitored—not merely as token inclusions, but as integral, strategic components of ESG itself. Regulators have an essential role in shaping ESG narrative infrastructure. Current ESG disclosure standards typically prioritize technical accuracy and financial materiality, mostly targeting investor needs. Broadening these frameworks to explicitly incorporate public legitimacy could significantly enhance ESG’s impact. For example, regulators could introduce clear criteria assessing whether companies effectively communicate their ESG strategies to diverse stakeholders and evaluate how these communications influence brand value and reputational risk—approaches already emerging in Europe’s Green Claims Directive and the CSRD/ESRS focus on double materiality. Additionally, policy evaluations could systematically measure whether ESG initiatives are genuinely perceived as fair, inclusive, and beneficial by the communities they affect. Public support and trust require deliberate and continuous effort; they cannot be assumed or taken for granted. Fortunately, inspiring examples of effective ESG narrative infrastructure already exist. Companies like Patagonia have openly integrated supplier and worker voices into their ESG narratives, transparently highlighting labour practices and sourcing standards, significantly enhancing their credibility. Unilever’s inclusive “living wage” campaigns have similarly leveraged stories from frontline workers to connect ESG metrics with tangible social outcomes, strengthening stakeholder trust. Industry-specific initiatives, such as the Bangladesh Accord in apparel, demonstrate how authentically incorporating diverse stakeholder experiences—including employees, unions, and community representatives—into ESG reporting can reinforce accountability and legitimacy. These examples highlight how inclusive storytelling, grounded in genuine stakeholder participation, can transform ESG commitments from abstract promises into credible actions with real-world impact. ESG professionals now face an exciting strategic opportunity: intentionally building a narrative infrastructure that's genuinely inclusive, collaborative, and resilient. Yes, involving diverse stakeholders means navigating complexity, dialogue, and occasionally tough compromises. It also means embracing participatory processes that might feel messier or less predictable. But it's exactly this diversity of voices and collective authorship that generates persuasive, robust narratives—ones that not only resonate widely but can confidently withstand shifts in politics, culture, and public sentiment. Beyond strengthening ESG's narrative infrastructure, it's important for ESG professionals to step back and consider sustainability more broadly. By explicitly linking ESG narratives to overarching sustainability objectives—such as respecting planetary boundaries and enabling a just transition—professionals can better illustrate how financial markets, corporate strategies, and policy frameworks actively support broader ecological and social well-being. Making these broader connections explicit can deepen trust, enhance engagement, and ensure the interconnected ESG-sustainability story resonates meaningfully with all those whose futures depend on it. We stand at a turning point, facing a critical opportunity to strengthen ESG’s narrative foundations. While ESG’s narrative fragility has been clearly exposed, this moment also offers an inspiring chance to intentionally build a more inclusive, credible, and resilient narrative infrastructure. The future of sustainability depends not only on rigorous metrics or detailed disclosures, but ultimately on whether those whose lives are impacted recognize themselves clearly in its story. By authentically amplifying diverse voices, explicitly connecting ESG initiatives to broader sustainability goals, and developing narratives rooted in real-world experiences, we can foster the trust, legitimacy, and collective commitment necessary for meaningful and lasting progress.
By Antoinette de Crombrugghe May 15, 2025
I belong to a generation raised in the shadow of the climate crisis. But it wasn’t something we were taught in school. It wasn’t part of our curriculum, our standardized tests, our childhood vocabulary. We came across it slowly, in fragments, through social media, activism, panic headlines, and documentaries. We educated ourselves. We connected the dots. And still, many of us are figuring out how to carry this knowledge and how to live with it without being crushed by it.
PHOTO: Ana Bachurova | Pléneau Island, 65°06.6’S / 064°04.0’W
By Ana Bachurova March 20, 2025
After recent travels in Antarctica, UNEP-FI Energy Efficiency Lead Ana Bachurova, M.Sc., MBA shares learnings and insights into our current environmental realities and how practitioners in sustainable development can advance positive impacts.
More blog posts