COP28: Diving for Tomorrow's Pearls

John Elkington • December 21, 2023

John Elkington, Founder and Chief Pollinator at Volans and ISSP Sustainability Hall of Fame Honoree, shares an on-the-ground view into COP28 — and the implications of its final declaration.


Long before I first visited Abu Dhabi and Dubai over a decade ago, I knew the story of the collapse of the region’s pearl industry almost a century before. Japan’s discovery of how to grow cultured pearls led to the implosion of the region’s pearl diving sector, an economic mainstay of the so-called Trucial States. One result: extreme poverty. Then, happily for what would later become the United Arab Emirates, or UAE, a floating oil drilling platform was moored over the Umm Shaif pearl bed and, in 1958, struck oil.


By 2021, the UAE would rank as the world’s seventh largest producer of liquid fuels. Cue horror among activists when the UAE was picked to host this year’s COP28 climate summit—and, worse, when it emerged that the conference president would be the head of the country’s leading oil company, ADNOC, or the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company. A fox, as our American friends might say, in charge of the chicken house.


So much has now been said about Dr. Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber that further comment is redundant but as our flight touched down at Dubai’s international airport, and although I have long had ferocious antibodies to the COP process, I was feeling decidedly upbeat.


Partly this was because we had already heard announcements by governments, businesses, investors, and philanthropists that over $57 billion would be invested across the climate agenda. Even more striking, the once-unmentionable concept of “loss and damage” was now on the agenda. Indeed, a breakthrough deal was launched to help the world’s poorest and most vulnerable countries cope with the mounting costs imposed by climate-induced weather disasters — and by slower-evolving disasters caused by sea level rise, melting glaciers, and ocean acidification.


When the deal was announced on the first day of the summit, it won a standing ovation.


Next, 118 countries committed to triple total investment in renewable energy infrastructure and to double energy efficiency funding, both by 2030. At least as important, they agreed to make the principle of energy efficiency as the "first fuel” the very heart of policymaking, planning, and major investment decisions. There seemed to be real momentum behind the change agenda.


As at Glasgow’s COP26 in 2021, I was travelling with Volans CEO Louise Kjellerup Roper, our token Dane. But when we arrived at the giant Expo 2020 site on the outskirts of Dubai, we did so as honorary Finns — this time with access to both the inner Blue and outer Green Zones. We were there at the invitation of Finland’s largest company, Neste — where, over several years, we have helped evolve their advisory council on sustainability and new markets.


I was due to speak at a Neste event in the Finnish Pavilion, entitled “Let’s Fuel Change: Accelerating Sustainable Mobility.” Successive panels drew in key players from the aviation sector, including Airbus, Boeing, and the Smart Freight Centre — which Finnish colleagues delightfully persisted in calling the “Smart Fright Centre.”


Later, we joined the high-spirited celebration of Finnish Independence Day, though there were other reasons why COP28 boosted our own spirits. One was the sheer number of people — known and unknown — we bumped into while traversing the site. The sense of a global community coming together to connect and celebrate each other was palpable.


Indeed, serendipity went into overdrive. One morning, Louise and I were headed for a meeting with Dubai Holding (Dubai ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum's personal investment portfolio, where I am joining a new advisory board), when we heard singing. Turning a corner, we came upon an Indonesian dance group performing to foot-tapping music — conjuring smiles on the faces of all within hearing. Soul-stirring.

Climate-friendly dance (Photo: John Elkington)

Louise and I were also at COP28 to speak at several events organised in the Climate Finance Pavilion. The host was another client, First Abu Dhabi Bank, or FAB. Louise chaired a panel on the future of sustainable aviation fuel, or SAF, while I took part in a “fireside chat” with FAB Chief Sustainability Officer, Shargiil Bashir. Among other things, we discussed our new joint white paper on greenwashing and greenhushing. At the end of the session, he confided with the audience that I hadn’t asked a single question he had prepared for — but perhaps that’s the nature of this rapidly mutating agenda of ours.


The scale of our mutually reinforcing challenges was underscored by a virtual reality experience just around the corner in the Climate Finance Pavilion. Here schoolchildren and CEOs alike were immersed in a 360-degree vision of disrupted futures, kicking off with massive sandstorms and a Dubai hollowed out by forced migration, palaces reduced to flooded ruins, through to an increasingly upbeat world with vast undersea renewable energy generators gently turning as schools of fish and dolphins swam above restored coral reefs.


Louise and neighbor in virtual realities (Photo: John Elkington)

Then our plans to return to London were themselves disrupted. FAB Group CEO Hana Al Rostamani asked if I would travel south to Abu Dhabi for a major event where FAB was hosting 100 business leaders. I happily agreed and found myself speaking in front of the colorfully illuminated Cultural Foundation, with a brilliant Jupiter high overhead.


On the heels of FAB Vice Chairman H.E. Sheikh Mohamed bin Saif Al Nahyan and Hana Al Rostamani, I began by commending the UAE for its handling of the COP28 logistics—but noted that the real test would be the final agreement, and the extent to which it acknowledged the need for a fossil fuels phase-out. As a result, I argued, our global economy stands on the brink of profound disruption, whatever the impact of COP28 turns out to be.


As with the collapse of the pearling industry in the twentieth century, the twenty-first will see the accelerating replacement of fossil fuels with radically different energy economies. The UAE has long accepted this fact, one reason why it is has invested in the innovation platform of Masdar City. Still struggling to fulfil its original promise, Masdar’s early years were shaped by none other than founding CEO Dr Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber.


En route to Abu Dhabi, we decided to visit a fascinating example of the UAE’s emerging sustainability-focused economy: a fish-, samphire- and mangrove-producing aquaculture facility prototyping novel forms of saltwater irrigation. Knowing the history of soil salinization that dogged traditional forms of agriculture in the region, I was sceptical. But when we were shown around by Regenerative Resources CEO Neal Spackman, I was reminded of my early interest in aquaculture half a century back.


Instead, I opted for a career promoting sustainability in business and markets. Now, if the writing on COP28’s walls and hoardings was any clue, the challenge of getting businesspeople to speak the language of sustainability is behind us. Instead, the challenge is to regenerate our economies, societies and, ultimately, biosphere.


The final COP28 declaration split our team down the middle—as it did the world. Policy-oriented folk saw it as a betrayal, evidence of the dark deeds of the fossil fuel world. No question, there were dark deeds aplenty and a fair few betrayals, intentional or not. But the activists among us saw the language in the agreement as a powerful signal that we are now seeing the “beginning of the end” of the fossil fuel era—as the UN put it, “laying the ground for a swift, just and equitable transition, underpinned by deep emissions cuts and scaled-up finance.” A small rent, a fracture, has opened in the walls of the besieged fossil fuel wall world, which we can now work to open out, until the trickle of incremental change becomes a transformative flood.


However much lobbying for the fossil fuel and meat industries, among others, may try to stall the looming disruptions, the friction created as their old order slams into new realities is already spurring the evolution of radically different mindsets, business models, and success metrics. Think of them as the pearls of tomorrow’s economies.


Regenerative Resources CEO Neal Spackman warms to mangroves (Photo: John Elkington)



About the Author:

John Elkington

Founder and Chief Pollinator at Volans

ISSP Sustainability Hall of Fame Honoree


Photo: John Elkington | UAE Pavilion at COP28


Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

By Ioannis Ioannou, PhD June 19, 2025
London Business School Professor Ioannis Ioannou, PhD examines the vulnerable narrative infrastructure surrounding ESG. By collaboratively engaging those most affected by ESG transitions—indigenous peoples, workers, young people, small businesses, and communities, particularly in the Global South—we can foster the trust, legitimacy, and collective commitment for meaningful progress. Who Gets to Tell the Story of ESG? For more than a decade, ESG rapidly evolved from a specialized investor consideration into an elaborate global infrastructure of standards, metrics, taxonomies, and disclosure frameworks. Investor attention soared, corporate sustainability teams grew exponentially, and ESG vocabulary— climate risk, fiduciary duty, and double materiality—became firmly embedded in corporate boardrooms and regulatory discussions globally. Yet, despite ESG’s impressive institutional and technical advancements, the narrative meant to support it remained remarkably fragile. While ESG developed sophisticated standards, disclosures, and metrics, it never invested in the narrative infrastructure to explain its purpose, build public understanding, or secure legitimacy beyond institutional circles. Without the broader stakeholder engagement and effective storytelling that would connect ESG to people’s lived realities, it became vulnerable. Critics didn’t need to challenge carbon accounting or materiality frameworks; instead, they recast ESG as a job killer, an elite agenda, or an unwelcome intrusion into everyday life. The backlash caught many ESG professionals off guard, though the warning signs were visible. ESG’s rapid adoption by investors and regulatory bodies created an illusion of momentum, but this obscured a deeper structural gap. ESG rarely connected meaningfully with those directly affected by ESG-driven transitions—workers facing disruption, small business owners adapting to shifting expectations, and communities, particularly in vulnerable regions, confronting real and immediate climate risks. For these groups, ESG often seemed abstract, distant, and disconnected from their daily concerns. Narrative infrastructure might sound like an unusual concept, but it's foundational to widespread support. It connects people and institutions, conveys meaning, and determines whether ESG is seen as genuine leadership or merely corporate branding. Robust narrative infrastructure ensures resilience under political pressure; without it, initiatives can rapidly lose whatever public approval they may have had. Constructing narrative infrastructure requires explicitly recognizing storytelling— and who contributes to that storytelling—as integral to ESG strategy, not simply a communications exercise. Effective narratives generate trust precisely because they emerge from transparent dialogue, clear accountability, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. By contrast, greenwashing uses storytelling deceptively, aiming to conceal poor performance, and deflect scrutiny. Strong narrative infrastructure, unlike greenwashing, strengthens credibility and legitimacy by openly connecting ESG commitments to shared realities, tangible actions, and measurable outcomes. It is a fundamental strategic asset for ESG success. Importantly, narrative infrastructure also concerns who gets to tell these stories. Over the last decade, the central narrators of the ESG story have largely been institutional actors: executives, investors, sustainability professionals, academics, and regulators. Their contributions have been invaluable, driven by expertise, rigor, and genuine commitment. Yet these narrators also represent a relatively narrow perspective, shaped by institutional backgrounds and professional incentives. Many important voices have remained largely excluded from shaping ESG narratives: indigenous people whose lives are often fundamentally changed by corporate activities, workers whose livelihoods are directly impacted by ESG transitions, young people deeply invested in future outcomes, small businesses continuously adapting to new ESG-related requirements, and especially communities—particularly in the Global South —directly facing the worst of climate disruptions. While these stakeholders' experiences occasionally appear within ESG reporting, they seldom influenced strategy or shape decisions in a substantial way. This exclusion poses significant, practical risks. Stakeholders naturally resist initiatives perceived as imposed from above or disconnected from their lived realities—not necessarily because they oppose ESG’s goals, but because they feel unheard and invisible within such ESG narratives. The resistance appears as political backlash, active public scepticism, or disengagement, all severely undermining ESG’s legitimacy, effectiveness, and public support. Addressing this critical weakness requires deliberately building ESG’s narrative infrastructure through inclusive, collaborative, and ongoing engagement. Practically, companies should move beyond occasional or reactive consultations toward sustained processes where stakeholders actively shape strategies. This can involve establishing community advisory boards with real decision-making power, participatory scenario planning that integrates diverse local perspectives, and internal cross-functional councils that ensure workers, communities, and youth voices directly influence ESG outcomes. Such sustained, authentic collaboration bridges the gap between institutional intentions and genuine public legitimacy. Within companies, narrative stewardship should not be limited to corporate communications or sustainability departments alone. Effective ESG storytelling depends on regular, structured collaboration across multiple functions—including strategy, human resources, procurement, product development, and finance—to ensure ESG commitments align authentically with core business decisions and reflect real-world stakeholder experiences. Companies can institutionalize this collaboration by creating dedicated cross-functional ESG committees tasked with integrating diverse internal perspectives, monitoring stakeholder feedback, and ensuring ESG initiatives clearly connect to tangible social outcomes. At an institutional level, building ESG narrative infrastructure involves establishing platforms that broaden participation in ESG discourse. It requires supporting initiatives that improve public understanding of ESG standards and practices, funding research that evaluates public perceptions of ESG alongside traditional financial metrics and ensuring ESG disclosures transparently reflect diverse stakeholder concerns. ESG narrative legitimacy grows stronger when diverse perspectives genuinely shape how ESG commitments are determined and communicated, implemented, and monitored—not merely as token inclusions, but as integral, strategic components of ESG itself. Regulators have an essential role in shaping ESG narrative infrastructure. Current ESG disclosure standards typically prioritize technical accuracy and financial materiality, mostly targeting investor needs. Broadening these frameworks to explicitly incorporate public legitimacy could significantly enhance ESG’s impact. For example, regulators could introduce clear criteria assessing whether companies effectively communicate their ESG strategies to diverse stakeholders and evaluate how these communications influence brand value and reputational risk—approaches already emerging in Europe’s Green Claims Directive and the CSRD/ESRS focus on double materiality. Additionally, policy evaluations could systematically measure whether ESG initiatives are genuinely perceived as fair, inclusive, and beneficial by the communities they affect. Public support and trust require deliberate and continuous effort; they cannot be assumed or taken for granted. Fortunately, inspiring examples of effective ESG narrative infrastructure already exist. Companies like Patagonia have openly integrated supplier and worker voices into their ESG narratives, transparently highlighting labour practices and sourcing standards, significantly enhancing their credibility. Unilever’s inclusive “living wage” campaigns have similarly leveraged stories from frontline workers to connect ESG metrics with tangible social outcomes, strengthening stakeholder trust. Industry-specific initiatives, such as the Bangladesh Accord in apparel, demonstrate how authentically incorporating diverse stakeholder experiences—including employees, unions, and community representatives—into ESG reporting can reinforce accountability and legitimacy. These examples highlight how inclusive storytelling, grounded in genuine stakeholder participation, can transform ESG commitments from abstract promises into credible actions with real-world impact. ESG professionals now face an exciting strategic opportunity: intentionally building a narrative infrastructure that's genuinely inclusive, collaborative, and resilient. Yes, involving diverse stakeholders means navigating complexity, dialogue, and occasionally tough compromises. It also means embracing participatory processes that might feel messier or less predictable. But it's exactly this diversity of voices and collective authorship that generates persuasive, robust narratives—ones that not only resonate widely but can confidently withstand shifts in politics, culture, and public sentiment. Beyond strengthening ESG's narrative infrastructure, it's important for ESG professionals to step back and consider sustainability more broadly. By explicitly linking ESG narratives to overarching sustainability objectives—such as respecting planetary boundaries and enabling a just transition—professionals can better illustrate how financial markets, corporate strategies, and policy frameworks actively support broader ecological and social well-being. Making these broader connections explicit can deepen trust, enhance engagement, and ensure the interconnected ESG-sustainability story resonates meaningfully with all those whose futures depend on it. We stand at a turning point, facing a critical opportunity to strengthen ESG’s narrative foundations. While ESG’s narrative fragility has been clearly exposed, this moment also offers an inspiring chance to intentionally build a more inclusive, credible, and resilient narrative infrastructure. The future of sustainability depends not only on rigorous metrics or detailed disclosures, but ultimately on whether those whose lives are impacted recognize themselves clearly in its story. By authentically amplifying diverse voices, explicitly connecting ESG initiatives to broader sustainability goals, and developing narratives rooted in real-world experiences, we can foster the trust, legitimacy, and collective commitment necessary for meaningful and lasting progress.
By Antoinette de Crombrugghe May 15, 2025
I belong to a generation raised in the shadow of the climate crisis. But it wasn’t something we were taught in school. It wasn’t part of our curriculum, our standardized tests, our childhood vocabulary. We came across it slowly, in fragments, through social media, activism, panic headlines, and documentaries. We educated ourselves. We connected the dots. And still, many of us are figuring out how to carry this knowledge and how to live with it without being crushed by it.
PHOTO: Ana Bachurova | Pléneau Island, 65°06.6’S / 064°04.0’W
By Ana Bachurova March 20, 2025
After recent travels in Antarctica, UNEP-FI Energy Efficiency Lead Ana Bachurova, M.Sc., MBA shares learnings and insights into our current environmental realities and how practitioners in sustainable development can advance positive impacts.
More blog posts