COP28: Diving for Tomorrow's Pearls

John Elkington

John Elkington, Founder and Chief Pollinator at Volans and ISSP Sustainability Hall of Fame Honoree, shares an on-the-ground view into COP28 — and the implications of its final declaration.


Long before I first visited Abu Dhabi and Dubai over a decade ago, I knew the story of the collapse of the region’s pearl industry almost a century before. Japan’s discovery of how to grow cultured pearls led to the implosion of the region’s pearl diving sector, an economic mainstay of the so-called Trucial States. One result: extreme poverty. Then, happily for what would later become the United Arab Emirates, or UAE, a floating oil drilling platform was moored over the Umm Shaif pearl bed and, in 1958, struck oil.


By 2021, the UAE would rank as the world’s seventh largest producer of liquid fuels. Cue horror among activists when the UAE was picked to host this year’s COP28 climate summit—and, worse, when it emerged that the conference president would be the head of the country’s leading oil company, ADNOC, or the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company. A fox, as our American friends might say, in charge of the chicken house.


So much has now been said about Dr. Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber that further comment is redundant but as our flight touched down at Dubai’s international airport, and although I have long had ferocious antibodies to the COP process, I was feeling decidedly upbeat.


Partly this was because we had already heard announcements by governments, businesses, investors, and philanthropists that over $57 billion would be invested across the climate agenda. Even more striking, the once-unmentionable concept of “loss and damage” was now on the agenda. Indeed, a breakthrough deal was launched to help the world’s poorest and most vulnerable countries cope with the mounting costs imposed by climate-induced weather disasters — and by slower-evolving disasters caused by sea level rise, melting glaciers, and ocean acidification.


When the deal was announced on the first day of the summit, it won a standing ovation.


Next, 118 countries committed to triple total investment in renewable energy infrastructure and to double energy efficiency funding, both by 2030. At least as important, they agreed to make the principle of energy efficiency as the "first fuel” the very heart of policymaking, planning, and major investment decisions. There seemed to be real momentum behind the change agenda.


As at Glasgow’s COP26 in 2021, I was travelling with Volans CEO Louise Kjellerup Roper, our token Dane. But when we arrived at the giant Expo 2020 site on the outskirts of Dubai, we did so as honorary Finns — this time with access to both the inner Blue and outer Green Zones. We were there at the invitation of Finland’s largest company, Neste — where, over several years, we have helped evolve their advisory council on sustainability and new markets.


I was due to speak at a Neste event in the Finnish Pavilion, entitled “Let’s Fuel Change: Accelerating Sustainable Mobility.” Successive panels drew in key players from the aviation sector, including Airbus, Boeing, and the Smart Freight Centre — which Finnish colleagues delightfully persisted in calling the “Smart Fright Centre.”


Later, we joined the high-spirited celebration of Finnish Independence Day, though there were other reasons why COP28 boosted our own spirits. One was the sheer number of people — known and unknown — we bumped into while traversing the site. The sense of a global community coming together to connect and celebrate each other was palpable.


Indeed, serendipity went into overdrive. One morning, Louise and I were headed for a meeting with Dubai Holding (Dubai ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum's personal investment portfolio, where I am joining a new advisory board), when we heard singing. Turning a corner, we came upon an Indonesian dance group performing to foot-tapping music — conjuring smiles on the faces of all within hearing. Soul-stirring.

Climate-friendly dance (Photo: John Elkington)

Louise and I were also at COP28 to speak at several events organised in the Climate Finance Pavilion. The host was another client, First Abu Dhabi Bank, or FAB. Louise chaired a panel on the future of sustainable aviation fuel, or SAF, while I took part in a “fireside chat” with FAB Chief Sustainability Officer, Shargiil Bashir. Among other things, we discussed our new joint white paper on greenwashing and greenhushing. At the end of the session, he confided with the audience that I hadn’t asked a single question he had prepared for — but perhaps that’s the nature of this rapidly mutating agenda of ours.


The scale of our mutually reinforcing challenges was underscored by a virtual reality experience just around the corner in the Climate Finance Pavilion. Here schoolchildren and CEOs alike were immersed in a 360-degree vision of disrupted futures, kicking off with massive sandstorms and a Dubai hollowed out by forced migration, palaces reduced to flooded ruins, through to an increasingly upbeat world with vast undersea renewable energy generators gently turning as schools of fish and dolphins swam above restored coral reefs.


Louise and neighbor in virtual realities (Photo: John Elkington)

Then our plans to return to London were themselves disrupted. FAB Group CEO Hana Al Rostamani asked if I would travel south to Abu Dhabi for a major event where FAB was hosting 100 business leaders. I happily agreed and found myself speaking in front of the colorfully illuminated Cultural Foundation, with a brilliant Jupiter high overhead.


On the heels of FAB Vice Chairman H.E. Sheikh Mohamed bin Saif Al Nahyan and Hana Al Rostamani, I began by commending the UAE for its handling of the COP28 logistics—but noted that the real test would be the final agreement, and the extent to which it acknowledged the need for a fossil fuels phase-out. As a result, I argued, our global economy stands on the brink of profound disruption, whatever the impact of COP28 turns out to be.


As with the collapse of the pearling industry in the twentieth century, the twenty-first will see the accelerating replacement of fossil fuels with radically different energy economies. The UAE has long accepted this fact, one reason why it is has invested in the innovation platform of Masdar City. Still struggling to fulfil its original promise, Masdar’s early years were shaped by none other than founding CEO Dr Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber.


En route to Abu Dhabi, we decided to visit a fascinating example of the UAE’s emerging sustainability-focused economy: a fish-, samphire- and mangrove-producing aquaculture facility prototyping novel forms of saltwater irrigation. Knowing the history of soil salinization that dogged traditional forms of agriculture in the region, I was sceptical. But when we were shown around by Regenerative Resources CEO Neal Spackman, I was reminded of my early interest in aquaculture half a century back.


Instead, I opted for a career promoting sustainability in business and markets. Now, if the writing on COP28’s walls and hoardings was any clue, the challenge of getting businesspeople to speak the language of sustainability is behind us. Instead, the challenge is to regenerate our economies, societies and, ultimately, biosphere.


The final COP28 declaration split our team down the middle—as it did the world. Policy-oriented folk saw it as a betrayal, evidence of the dark deeds of the fossil fuel world. No question, there were dark deeds aplenty and a fair few betrayals, intentional or not. But the activists among us saw the language in the agreement as a powerful signal that we are now seeing the “beginning of the end” of the fossil fuel era—as the UN put it, “laying the ground for a swift, just and equitable transition, underpinned by deep emissions cuts and scaled-up finance.” A small rent, a fracture, has opened in the walls of the besieged fossil fuel wall world, which we can now work to open out, until the trickle of incremental change becomes a transformative flood.


However much lobbying for the fossil fuel and meat industries, among others, may try to stall the looming disruptions, the friction created as their old order slams into new realities is already spurring the evolution of radically different mindsets, business models, and success metrics. Think of them as the pearls of tomorrow’s economies.


Regenerative Resources CEO Neal Spackman warms to mangroves (Photo: John Elkington)



About the Author:

John Elkington

Founder and Chief Pollinator at Volans

ISSP Sustainability Hall of Fame Honoree


Photo: John Elkington | UAE Pavilion at COP28


Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

Paper cut-out figures holding hands in a chain against a dark blue background.
By Elizabeth Dinschel, December 18, 2025 December 18, 2025
Elizabeth Dinschel, MA, MBA, is the Executive Director of ISSP Earlier this month, we hosted our first global ISSP Town Hall since I stepped into the role of Executive Director. I logged off that call energized, humbled, and deeply grateful for the honesty, generosity, and care that our members brought into the space. This Town Hall was never meant to be a one-way update. It was designed as a listening session — a chance for ISSP leadership and staff to hear directly from sustainability professionals across regions, sectors, and career stages. And you delivered. What follows are a few reflections on what I heard, what we learned, and where we’re headed next together. Why We Called This Town Hall ISSP has gone through a period of transition — new leadership, new staff, and a renewed focus on modernizing how we serve a truly global membership. Change can be energizing, but it can also create moments of uncertainty and disconnection. We knew we needed to pause, gather our community, and listen with intention. The Town Hall brought together members from multiple continents, industries, and disciplines. Sustainability practitioners, consultants, engineers, communicators, policy professionals, and career-transitioners all showed up with thoughtful questions and candid feedback. One thing was immediately clear: this community cares deeply about its work, about each other, and about ISSP’s role in supporting sustainability professionals at a challenging moment for the field.
Can sustainability be saved by tackling loneliness, not just CO₂ emissions?
By Raz Godelnik, Associate Professor November 20, 2025
Raz Godelnik is an Associate Professor of Strategic Design and Management at Parsons School of Design — The New School. He is the author of Rethinking Corporate Sustainability in the Era of Climate Crisis . You can follow him on LinkedIn .  Can sustainability be saved by tackling loneliness, not just CO₂ emissions? Earlier this month, I stopped at Sunshine Coffee in Laramie, Wyoming, on our way to Yellowstone Park. What brought me there was the fact that it’s a zero-waste coffee shop, with no single-use consumer items. In other words, there are no disposable cups — not for customers dining in, and not even for those who want their coffee to go, like I did. Instead, you can either bring your own reusable cup or get your drink in a glass jar for $1, which is refunded on your next order when you return it (or you can simply keep it, as I did). At first, I was excited about the zero-waste coffee shop concept, wondering what it would take for Starbucks and other coffee chains to adopt it and eliminate the waste that has become an integral part of our coffee (and other drinks) consumption. But as I waited for my coffee, I began to notice something else — something that had little to do with waste and everything to do with people. As I looked around, I noticed their stickers. Beneath the logo, it read: Zero waste. Community space . Suddenly it clicked — this coffee shop isn’t just about eliminating waste; it’s about creating a place where people feel connected. As owner and founder of Sunshine Coffee, Megan Johnson, explained in an interview with This is Laramie : “I wanted to bring sustainable values to Wyoming as well as build a business that serves the community.” That got me thinking about how the second part — serving the community — is integral to the first. After all, in a world where loneliness — a key barrier to people’s well-being — is on the rise, shouldn’t creating spaces for connection be just as central to sustainability as going zero waste?
By Nicole Cacal, MSc, October 30, 2025
Nicole Cacal, MSc, is Executive Director of the TRUE Initiative in Hawaii and serves as Vice President on the Governing Board of ISSP. In our October blog, she challenges the prevailing narrative around AI's environmental impact, arguing that strategic deployment can transform AI from an environmental burden into a driver of recursive sustainability. Drawing on her background in strategic design and technology management, she presents emerging pathways for responsible AI adoption that balance societal benefit against environmental risk. Toward Appropriate and Responsible AI: Pathways to Sustainable Adoption and Infrastructure Nicole Cacal · October 27, 2025 Whenever I give an AI presentation or offer advice on AI adoption, whether to business owners, C-level executives, or sustainability professionals, one concern surfaces time and time again, especially here in Hawaii: the environmental tension. People want to explore AI's potential, but they're acutely aware of the energy consumption, the water usage, the carbon footprint. It's become almost a reflex: mention AI, and someone immediately raises the environmental cost. I get it. The data centers, the training runs, and the resource demands. They're real and they're significant. But here's what I've come to believe: if we shift the narrative from focusing solely on AI's detriment to the environment and instead ask how much good it can create, what role we can play in driving data centers to go greener, and how we can generate recursive sustainability, we unlock better questions. We start thinking forward rather than just defensively. As sustainability professionals, our job isn't to reject technology wholesale. It's to shape its evolution. And right now, we have an opportunity to influence how AI develops and deploys in ways that align with planetary boundaries and social equity. But to do that, we need to move beyond binary thinking. Right-Sizing AI: Why Bigger Isn't Always Better One of the most overlooked levers we have for sustainable AI is also one of the simplest: choosing the right model for the job. The AI industry has been caught in a "bigger is better" arms race for years now. Every new model release touts more parameters, more capabilities, more everything. And sure, these massive general-purpose models are impressive. But they've created a dangerous assumption: that every task requires maximum firepower. This is where my strategic design training from Parsons kicks in. Good design isn't about having the biggest toolkit. It's about matching the tool to the task. It's about elegance through constraint. The same principle applies to AI deployment. The emerging concept of "Small is Sufficient " is gaining traction for good reason. Research shows that selecting smaller, purpose-fit AI models for specific tasks can achieve nearly the same accuracy as their larger counterparts while reducing global energy demand by up to 28% . Twenty-eight percent. That's not marginal; that's transformational. Think about what your organization actually needs. Are you processing customer service inquiries? Analyzing spreadsheet data? Generating product descriptions? Most of these tasks don't require a frontier model. A fine-tuned, task-specific model will do the job with a fraction of the computational overhead. The shift we need is cultural as much as technical. We need to move from asking "what's the most powerful AI we can deploy?" to "what's the most appropriate AI for this specific use case?" That question changes everything, from procurement decisions to vendor relationships, internal training, and infrastructure planning. AI as Infrastructure Manager: The Self-Optimizing Data Center Here's an irony that doesn't get enough attention: AI might be energy-intensive, but it's also one of our best tools for managing energy systems efficiently. When we only think of AI as a consumer of data center resources, we miss part of the story. AI can also be the conductor of efficiency, orchestrating complex systems in real-time to minimize waste and maximize renewable integration. Consider three optimization domains where AI is already making measurable impact: Cooling systems: Data centers generate enormous heat, and cooling accounts for a massive portion of their energy use. AI can continuously adjust cooling based on workload patterns, outside temperature, humidity, and dozens of other variables, optimizing in ways that static systems simply can't match. Workload scheduling: Not all computing tasks need to happen immediately. AI can intelligently schedule batch processing, model training, and background tasks for times when renewable energy is abundant or when grid demand is lowest. This isn't just theory. Companies are already doing this. Renewable energy integration: This one hits close to home in Hawaii, where we're working toward aggressive renewable energy targets but face unique challenges with grid stability and storage. AI-managed facilities can modulate demand in response to solar and wind availability, essentially turning data centers into flexible grid assets rather than inflexible burdens. When organizations approach their operations as integrated systems rather than collections of independent components, they achieve results that surprise even them. AI-orchestrated data centers represent this systems thinking at its most sophisticated. The technology optimizes itself recursively, reducing the footprint of AI through AI. That's the kind of elegant solution we should be scaling. Measuring What Matters: Beyond Energy to Net Benefit But here's the challenge: if we only measure AI's direct energy consumption, we miss the full picture. We need frameworks that capture both the operational cost and the systemic benefit. This is where life cycle assessment combined with comparative modeling becomes essential. We need to ask: compared to what? And over what timeframe? The sectoral success stories are compelling when you run the numbers: Building automation systems powered by AI are consistently achieving energy savings in the range of 20-30% across diverse building types. One documented case study of a commercial office building in the United States showed a 32% reduction in overall energy consumption with a 2.4-year return on investment (a $2.1 million system investment generating $875,000 in annual savings). In Stockholm, the SISAB school building portfolio achieved similar results with a two-year payback period. In precision agriculture, AI-driven irrigation and fertilizer application systems are cutting water consumption by 20% to as much as 50% and reducing chemical runoff, addressing both resource scarcity and ecosystem health. Waste management optimization is another powerful example. AI-powered sorting systems in recycling facilities dramatically improve material recovery rates while reducing contamination. The resource efficiency gains far exceed the AI system's energy footprint. These aren't marginal improvements. When properly deployed, targeted AI applications produce emissions savings and resource efficiencies that dwarf their own operational costs. That being said, given today's fossil fueled data center expansions, we may find that we have much further to go in making the environmental positives outweigh the negatives. But that's no reason to throw in the towel or to assume that these technologies cannot - over time - deliver more environmental benefits than downsides. It requires companies to demand more of their technology providers and deploy their systems sustainably when greener options become available. But (and this is crucial) these benefits only materialize when we pair the right AI with the right infrastructure and the right deployment strategy. Which brings us to governance. The Path Forward: Governance, Transparency, and Adaptive Thinking The sustainability community, including organizations like ISSP, is actively developing shared frameworks for assessing AI's net impact. These emerging approaches include system-level energy auditing, selective task deployment protocols, and strategies for minimizing "dark data" (the vast amounts of stored data that's never used but still requires energy to maintain). Multi-stakeholder governance initiatives are bringing together technologists, policymakers, environmental scientists, and business leaders to create adaptive standards. This isn't about creating rigid regulations that will be obsolete in two years. It's about establishing principles and processes that evolve with the technology. Those with a technology management background know that the most successful systems are those designed for adaptation. We need governance structures that can respond to new information, course-correct quickly, and remain grounded in measurable outcomes. Transparency is non-negotiable. Organizations deploying AI need to measure and report not just their energy consumption but their net impact. What problems are you solving? What resources are you saving? What would the alternative approach have cost? These aren't easy questions, but they're the right ones. As sustainability professionals, this is our arena. We have the frameworks: life cycle thinking, systems analysis, stakeholder engagement, and metrics development, to name a few. We need to apply these tools to AI with the same rigor we've applied to supply chains, built environments, and industrial processes. So here's my invitation: What are you seeing in your sector? How is your organization approaching the AI sustainability question? Are you finding innovative ways to ensure deployment is appropriate and responsible? Because ultimately, appropriate AI isn't about choosing between progress and sustainability. It's about insisting that progress is sustainable. It's about right-sizing models, optimizing infrastructure, measuring net benefit, and building governance systems worthy of the challenge. The technology itself is neutral. Our choices determine whether AI becomes a driver of sustainability or another extractive burden. Let's choose wisely.
More blog posts