Corporate Water Strategy: Where We Were and Where We're Going

Will Sarni

When it comes to water management, compliance and stewardship, where did we start and where are we going?



After over twenty years of experience in corporate sustainability and water strategy consulting, it is clear that water management and regulatory compliance alone is no longer a viable corporate water strategy. There is now a pressing need to address “outside the fence line” water issues, such as scarcity, poor quality, inequity in access to safe drinking water, and the impacts of climate change. While regulatory compliance for water and associated management practices are the cornerstone of a corporate water strategy, they do not deliver the full value to corporations, communities, and other stakeholders.


My view is that one of the initial, and perhaps the most publicized, water stewardship strategies was The Coca-Cola Company’s (TCCC) “Replenish” strategy. In 2007, TCCC set an aspirational 2020 goal to safely return to nature and to communities an amount of water equivalent to what the company uses annually in all its beverages and their production (Water Stewardship and Replenish Report, 2011). They beat their 2020 goal by five years (Beverage Daily, 2016). In 2016, this strategy and set of goals achieved replenishment of approximately 191.9 billion liters of water to local watersheds and communities across 71 countries—which, according to the company, was the equivalent to 115 percent of the water used in its finished beverage products the previous year.


This was a pivotal event in moving from water as regulatory compliance and “inside the fence line” management issue. Since the launch of TCCC’s replenish strategy, many more companies have moved to water stewardship strategies and some also framed their strategies as “replenish.”



Where We Are: Water Stewardship and Net Zero 

Water stewardship has taken root with most multinational companies across a range of industry sectors adopting this strategy to manage risks outside the fence line. Water stewardship is no longer only a strategy for consumer-facing companies. Now sectors such as mining, semiconductors, heavy manufacturing, and information and communication technology companies are building leading water-stewardship strategies.


However, we are again at a pivotal stage in how companies manage water as a critical resource for their supply chains, operations, and engagement with their customers, communities, and workforces. There are two trends that I consider to be significant in this regard: The move to “net zero” for water (GreenBiz, 2022) and a focus on watershed health.


First, net-zero for water. Several companies are now approaching water strategy in a similar manner as they approach climate change. The primary challenges with a net-zero strategy for water are that: 1) water is not fungible, and the spatially and temporally dynamic nature of water means that, unlike a common, global carbon pool, water is not the same from one location to another; and 2) net-zero is a concept rooted in target-setting and reporting. Water is more complex than carbon and has attributes, such as social and spiritual dimensions, that make a net-zero strategy for water more complex.


Second, a focus on watershed health initiatives. Companies such as PepsiCo and ABInBev are focusing on investments in watershed health to build sustainable and resilient communities and supply chains (PepsiCo and Water and Water Stewardship | AB InBev). This is an important movement and focus as several companies are looking at watersheds holistically and supporting the scaling of innovative digital technologies to measure water quality, quantity, supply chain performance, and productivity on a real-time basis.



Where We're Going: Innovation and Impact

Companies are increasingly focusing on investment in technology innovation and quantifying the positive impact of their water stewardship strategies. This trend is driven largely by the launch of corporate venture and innovation programs designed to accelerate the identification and deployment of innovative technologies. For example, ABInBev launched the 100+ Accelerator and PepsiCo launched PepsiCo Labs. Notable is that the 100+ Accelerator program now includes The Coca-Cola Company, Unilever, and Colgate Palmolive.


Companies are also focusing on how digital technologies can deliver real-time data in watersheds to better manage crop productivity (CropX), water use (N-Drip), and surface water quality (Gybe Water Quality). This trend will continue as companies better integrate water strategies into their business strategies to support growth and build sustainable and resilient supply chains and communities in which they operate.


The journey from water management to water stewardship to water strategy, fully integrated into a business strategy, is illustrated in Figure 1, below.

Water is no longer solely an issue of regulatory compliance. It is now a critical resource that fuels business growth, economic development, social well-being, and ecosystem health.


Going forward, we must accelerate how multinationals engage with innovation in public policy, technology, education, and awareness, and increase diversity and entrepreneurship in the water sector. There are a few companies bold enough today to venture into investing in changing the status quo beyond current strategies to reduce their water footprint. There is an opportunity to do more. And we must capitalize on it now.


TOP PHOTO: Inge Maria | Unsplash


About the Author:

Will Sarni
Founder & CEO, Water Foundry
Founder & General Partner, Colorado River Basin Fund

Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

By Jacqueline Kerr, PHD May 27, 2026
May 2026 We spend enormous energy telling people what needs to change, and very little time thinking about how change actually happens. Most sustainability efforts inside organizations are built around the individual. Convince the right person. Model the right behavior. Win the argument in the room. And to be fair, that approach gets things moving. Until it doesn't. The real barrier isn't information. It isn't even intent. It's the conditions we create for people to change together. What I'm seeing in the most effective organizations isn't individual champions doing heroic work. It's something more structural: well-designed groups where people shift together, hold each other accountable, and build something that doesn't collapse when one person leaves the room.
By Nitesh Dullabh April 28, 2026
April 2026 I walked away from a recent webinar with a lingering thought: we’ve spent years improving supply chains, but very little time truly rethinking them. Most of the systems we rely on today were built for efficiency - to move goods faster, cheaper, at scale. And to be fair, they’ve done that remarkably well. But they were never designed for the complexity we’re now facing: climate volatility, geopolitical and tariff uncertainty, water stress, soil degradation, and widening inequities across supply chains. So what do we do? We add layers - more audits, more reporting, more standards. Necessary? Yes. Sufficient? Not really. The deeper issue is not performance - it’s creating healthy conditions for design and structure. What I’m seeing instead, and what I believe is the real shift underway, is the move toward regenerative partnerships . Not transactional relationships, but systems of collaboration that are designed to endure, adapt, and regenerate value over time through and with relational relationships. 
By By Amy Hall, MSc, Education Lead, TripleWin Advisory March 23, 2026
March 23, 2026 I spend a lot of time thinking about how we teach sustainability. Not just the what , but the how and why . At TripleWin Advisory , a woman-founded, -owned, and -led sustainability consultancy and registered public benefit company, we believe real progress on circularity requires more than good intentions. It requires practitioners who are genuinely equipped to act. That conviction is what led us to develop two courses now available through ISSP: Cultivate and Mitigate . Both courses have since been adopted by universities and are reaching sustainability students across the country. Knowing what went into building them makes me want to share the story behind each one. Mitigate: Built From Practice, Not Textbooks Mitigate was created from hands-on work with partners tackling one of the most pressing issues in sustainability: food waste. Reducing food waste is consistently ranked among the highest-impact solutions to climate change, and yet it remains one of the most underfunded and under-addressed areas in the field. TripleWin Advisory has worked with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and the Pacific Coast Food Waste Commitment (PCFWC) , a public-private partnership whose frameworks were ultimately adopted at the national level. Those assets, that research, and those hard-won insights form the backbone of Mitigate. When we talk about food waste reduction strategies in this course, we're drawing on frameworks that have been tested and refined in real supply chains and policy environments. For learners who want to do this work professionally, that grounding matters. The University of Wisconsin has integrated Mitigate into their undergraduate and graduate sustainability programs, which speaks to what the course offers academically: rigorous, applied content that bridges the classroom and the field.
More blog posts