Science-based Targets for Nature are Critical to the Climate Solution

Erin Billman

A systemic challenge like the climate crisis requires systemic solutions. Recent science has made clear that solving climate change is not a 2050 imperative but one for today—the world will need to be well on the path to mid-century carbon-neutrality within the next nine years if we are going to hold global average temperatures to no more than 1.5-degrees Celsius of warming. To meet this level of urgency, communities, companies, and investors are calculating and adopting science-based targets. Science-based targets (SBTs) are measurable, actionable, and time-bound objectives, based on the best available science. For climate, science-based targets give companies a clearly-defined pathway to reduce emissions in line with the Paris Agreement goals. For nature, they will allow businesses to align their strategies with Earth’s limits and societal sustainability goals, like the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals.

Already, more than 1,200 companies are now committed to set science-based climate targets because they see the future is net-zero. These targets ensure their business strategies incorporate emissions reductions at an ambitious enough pace and scale to play their part in limiting global temperature rise in line with science.


Now we need to add nature into the equation. Nature needs protecting in its own right—as the provider of everything humans depend on to live our lives and run our businesses. And, critically, we can’t reach our climate goals without simultaneously addressing nature loss.


Building on the momentum of science-based targets for climate, the Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) was set up to develop an integrated solution to the nature and climate crises. The SBTN aims to break down silos between organizations, issues, and approaches in order to solve the interrelated challenges facing the global commons: climate change and the degradation of ecosystems critical for human well-being.


The SBTN is developing science-based targets for nature for companies, along with both climate and nature targets for cities. The nature targets for companies and cities will assess their impacts and dependencies on nature - by which we mean all non-human living entities - and in turn their interaction with other living or non-living physical entities and processes. This definition, from  the IPBES Global Assessment 2019, recognizes that all of these interactions bind humans to nature and beyond that, the interactions between species, soils, rivers or nutrients bind them to each other.


Addressing these two issues simultaneously will be the most efficient and effective way for business to take action on both nature loss and climate change—issues that have been defined as the greatest risks and opportunities of our time. The World Economic Forum’s Future of Nature and Business report estimates that nature-positive transitions could generate up to US$10.1 trillion in annual business value and create 395 million jobs by 2030.


Our approach at SBTN is a consolidated and comprehensive one. The targets address the interconnection of issue areas, allowing companies to take action on multiple issues at once and avoid creating new problems. When designed and implemented correctly, SBTs for nature will help companies to resolve interrelated climate and nature risks, including creating resilience to climate hazards, such as heat waves, floods, and droughts. As operations reorient to meet these targets, they can help conserve freshwater resources and increase water security, regenerate land systems, support healthy, diverse oceans and conserve biodiversity, and prevent species extinction.


The SBTN’s approach need not be duplicative nor require increased monitoring and reporting burden for companies. For many, the approach will build on existing resources and tools and, therefore, consolidate actions that companies are already taking. It draws heavily on the Natural Capital Protocol, existing practices in land-conversion-free supply chains, and lifecycle (impact) assessment (LC(I)A). In addition, it recognizes the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and SBTs for climate; contextual water targets; context-based targets more broadly; CDP; Global Reporting Initiative (GRI); and the Corporate Ecosystem Services Review as valuable for helping companies collect and organize data for SBT setting.


We will not limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C without protecting and restoring nature. Now is the time to bring every possible solution to bear. Companies need to take responsibility for their own impacts and dependencies on nature alongside cutting emissions in line with science. Buying carbon credits for projects outside of a company’s own sphere of influence will be nowhere near enough to achieve either their climate or nature goals.


The SBTN’s initial guidance on science-based targets (SBTs) for nature,  published last year, is a first step toward integrated SBTs for all aspects of nature: biodiversity, climate, freshwater, land, and ocean. Developing further enterprise methodologies to use SBTs for nature are well underway. These will enable voluntary action for nature and climate, in turn enabling stronger policy as governments gain confidence to set stronger climate and nature policies.


We invite the ISSP community to get in touch with us to begin your journey of setting SBTs for nature as integral to reaching global climate goals. You can also learn how to join our Corporate Engagement Program. In addition, we invite the ISSP community to join us in co-designing our targets and helping us to road-test them for impact, cost-effectiveness and user-experience. Together, we can build an integrated solution to the nature and climate crises.


Photo: Gary Cunliffe


About the Author:

Erin Billman
Executive Director, Science Based Targets Network

Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

By By Elizabeth Dinschel & Bangaly Kourouma January 16, 2026
January 16, 2026 At the International Society of Sustainability Professionals (ISSP), strategy is not theoretical. It is practical, action-oriented, and grounded in the real needs of sustainability professionals working in complex and rapidly evolving environments. The ISSP 2026 Strategic Plan is a one-year, execution-focused roadmap designed to strengthen ISSP’s role as a global professional association for sustainability practitioners. Built directly from member feedback gathered through Town Halls, surveys, and ongoing conversations, the plan focuses on three strategic priorities: financial stability, relevant professional knowledge, and meaningful member engagement. This article explains what the 2026 Strategic Plan is, why these priorities matter, and how member input directly shaped ISSP’s direction. What the ISSP 2026 Strategic Plan Is—and Is Not The 2026 Strategic Plan is not a long-term vision statement or a five-year forecast. It is a focused, one-year plan designed to deliver measurable progress. The plan is intended to: Strengthen ISSP’s financial sustainability Modernize sustainability education and credential resources Improve the member experience across career stages Each priority includes defined actions, timelines, and success metrics, ensuring accountability and transparency.
Paper cut-out figures holding hands in a chain against a dark blue background.
By Elizabeth Dinschel, December 18, 2025 December 18, 2025
Elizabeth Dinschel, MA, MBA, is the Executive Director of ISSP Earlier this month, we hosted our first global ISSP Town Hall since I stepped into the role of Executive Director. I logged off that call energized, humbled, and deeply grateful for the honesty, generosity, and care that our members brought into the space. This Town Hall was never meant to be a one-way update. It was designed as a listening session — a chance for ISSP leadership and staff to hear directly from sustainability professionals across regions, sectors, and career stages. And you delivered. What follows are a few reflections on what I heard, what we learned, and where we’re headed next together. Why We Called This Town Hall ISSP has gone through a period of transition — new leadership, new staff, and a renewed focus on modernizing how we serve a truly global membership. Change can be energizing, but it can also create moments of uncertainty and disconnection. We knew we needed to pause, gather our community, and listen with intention. The Town Hall brought together members from multiple continents, industries, and disciplines. Sustainability practitioners, consultants, engineers, communicators, policy professionals, and career-transitioners all showed up with thoughtful questions and candid feedback. One thing was immediately clear: this community cares deeply about its work, about each other, and about ISSP’s role in supporting sustainability professionals at a challenging moment for the field.
Can sustainability be saved by tackling loneliness, not just CO₂ emissions?
By Raz Godelnik, Associate Professor November 20, 2025
Raz Godelnik is an Associate Professor of Strategic Design and Management at Parsons School of Design — The New School. He is the author of Rethinking Corporate Sustainability in the Era of Climate Crisis . You can follow him on LinkedIn .  Can sustainability be saved by tackling loneliness, not just CO₂ emissions? Earlier this month, I stopped at Sunshine Coffee in Laramie, Wyoming, on our way to Yellowstone Park. What brought me there was the fact that it’s a zero-waste coffee shop, with no single-use consumer items. In other words, there are no disposable cups — not for customers dining in, and not even for those who want their coffee to go, like I did. Instead, you can either bring your own reusable cup or get your drink in a glass jar for $1, which is refunded on your next order when you return it (or you can simply keep it, as I did). At first, I was excited about the zero-waste coffee shop concept, wondering what it would take for Starbucks and other coffee chains to adopt it and eliminate the waste that has become an integral part of our coffee (and other drinks) consumption. But as I waited for my coffee, I began to notice something else — something that had little to do with waste and everything to do with people. As I looked around, I noticed their stickers. Beneath the logo, it read: Zero waste. Community space . Suddenly it clicked — this coffee shop isn’t just about eliminating waste; it’s about creating a place where people feel connected. As owner and founder of Sunshine Coffee, Megan Johnson, explained in an interview with This is Laramie : “I wanted to bring sustainable values to Wyoming as well as build a business that serves the community.” That got me thinking about how the second part — serving the community — is integral to the first. After all, in a world where loneliness — a key barrier to people’s well-being — is on the rise, shouldn’t creating spaces for connection be just as central to sustainability as going zero waste?
More blog posts