A Game Changer for Tackling the Living Wage Gap — Globally

May 16, 2024

Fiona Dragstra, General Director of the WageIndicator Foundation, shares how the NGO is providing updated, publicly accessible living wage estimates across 166 countries. Working with trade unions, employers, companies, and other living-wage stakeholders around the world, WageIndicator is helping to close the living wage gap globally.



Though the concept of a “living wage” dates back to 1919 when the preamble of the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO’s) Constitution called for “the provision of an adequate living wage,” it has taken almost a century for this movement to gather true momentum. The ILO’s adoption of principles on estimating living wages in March 2024, gives new wings to those who have long advocated for progress on this issue.


The rising cost-of-living across the world has deepened wealth inequality globally. According to the Business Council to Tackle Inequality, the top 10% of earners take home over half of total global pay, while the bottom 50% earn just 8.5% of that pie. In many economies that contribute massively to global supply chains, large numbers of workers live in poverty: 58% in Mozambique, 37% in India, 33% in Mexico, and in Europe one-in-ten is at risk. The payment of fair compensation can spark virtuous cycles that benefit workers, businesses and, subsequently, society at large, giving rise to stable, resilient, reliable, and better performing value chains and sustainable business practices.


Growing recognition that statutory minimum wages often fail to cover peoples’ basic needs has bolstered increasing support for the living wage movement. According to WageIndicator’s April 2024 data, in only 26 countries the lowest applicable statutory minimum wage was equal to or exceeded our living wage estimates.

WageIndicator.org – Minimum Wage – Living Wage gap across 166 countries worldwide, April 2024.


Scaling living wage estimates globally


At WageIndicator Foundation we have worked on living wages for over a decade. This was a logical step after creating globally comparable databases on Minimum Wages, Wages and Salaries, Labour Laws, and Collective Agreements, all aimed at enabling global labour market transparency through publicly available data resources. Our first living wage release in 2014 provided contextualised living wage data for 80 countries; our latest release in April 2024 provides regional level data for 2700+ regions across 166 countries.


We calculate living wages by estimating the costs of goods and services needed by workers and their families for a decent standard of living, contextualised for regional socio-economic realities. We devise estimates for a variety of family types and update our data on a quarterly basis through face-to-face and online data collection by some 300 data collectors across the world. We welcome the principles as set out by the ILO Governing Body, noting the importance of strengthening social dialogue and collective bargaining in operationalising the living wage, as well as promoting incremental progression from minimum wages to living wages.

 

Living wages as a linking pin in the SDGs


The living wage movement has not been solely driven by advocacy from NGOs and trade unions, nor by goodwill gestures from companies. Instead, it has emerged at the forefront of global agendas around sustainable business. Crucially, paying a living wage can be a linking pin for several of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Though they most directly link to SDG 8 (Decent work and Economic growth), SDG 1 (No poverty), and SDG 10 (Reduced inequalities), they are also contributory to SDG 2 (Zero hunger), SDG 3 (Good health and well-being), SDG 4 (Quality education), SDG 5 (Gender equality), and SDG 16 (Peace, justice, and strong institutions).


The significance of a living wage in advancing these goals underscores its integral role in enabling sustainable development and social progress. The UN Global Compact’s Faster Forward initiative highlights living wages as one of the five key ‘areas of action’ for corporate responsibility. Guiding businesses in aligning their strategies and operations with the universal principles of a living wage, gender equality, climate action, water security, and sustainable finance, the Faster Forward initiative supports integrating living wage policies throughout an organization's workforce as well as its supply chain.


This is similarly emphasized by sustainability reporting requirements imposed by recent and upcoming legislation such as the European Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). These regulations compel companies to disclose their social impact and ensure due diligence for human and environmental right violations across their supply chains, including efforts to ensure fair and adequate wages. By fostering transparency and accountability, such measures contribute to the broader aim of promoting corporate responsibility and ethical business practices.

 

How are companies and investors responding to these developments?


Companies, for their part, are increasingly committed to paying a living wage. And they are increasingly communicating that commitment publicly. PwC and WageIndicator’s Global Living Wage Survey 2023 found that 67% of businesses considered living wages a priority for their organisation and that 54% expected to make relevant commitments within the next five years.


Companies such as Fairphone have emerged as leaders in this movement, making ambitious and public commitments to the cause. Unilever, as well, made its first Framework for Fair Compensation in 2014, pledging to pay all its employees a living wage. And they expanded this ambition across their entire supply chain, aiming to require all their suppliers to pay their workers a living wage by 2030.


Ball Horticulture, a family company that works with over 8,000 individuals across over 30 regions globally, is another powerful example of putting these data in positive change. Unsure if their compensation policies met decent living standards, they approached WageIndicator in 2021. Ball Horticulture now uses WageIndicator’s Living Wage database to drive living wage commitments across their entire supply chain. After surveying 30 locations and identifying wage gaps in nine geographic areas, they have already implemented living wage policies in two regions and have devised action plans to accomplish the same for the rest. Using WageIndicator's living wage estimates, they negotiated with supply chain managers reluctant to pay more than minimum wage, showcasing the measurable negative impacts of inadequate compensation. While they're still addressing second-order effects like wage structure revisions and cost impacts, they are optimistic that improved wages will reduce attrition, cutting hiring and training costs. They believe retaining experienced workers will ultimately benefit consumers with better products and higher quality services.


Living wages are also gaining prominence in the investment landscape, as recently highlighted by the Swedish Buffer Fund, AP2. Their analysis indicates that while addressing social issues might seem challenging, the concept of living wages provides a clear and quantifiable metric, making it easier to track and enable effective policies and progress. Incorporating living wages into their investing approach allows them to engage with companies on human rights and supply chain issues, regardless of their geographical location. For them, paying a living wage is crucial for evaluating true company performance and ensuring fair competition across markets. As it should be for all.


Publicly available living wage estimates


The challenges associated with living wage commitments and implementation should not be underestimated. Many companies that started working on living wage implementation in their supply chains encountered the difficulty of having access to publicly available, consistently updated and regional living wage estimates at scale.


At WageIndicator, we made a first step to address this issue and therefore as of 1 May 2024, we have published our living wage estimates for over 2700 regions across 166 countries. We make these data publicly accessible to all, in the hope that the availability of updated estimates can empower wage negotiations and collective bargaining globally — facilitating the implementation of living wages everywhere.


In addition to making these living wage estimates publicly accessible, we continue our work together with trade unions, employers, companies, and other stakeholders in the living wage movement to demystify living wages. Of course, we would not be WageIndicator if our aim was not to continue to expand and maintain our living wage database — to ensure that these data remain publicly available, enabling equal access to this vital information for all.

About the Author:

Fiona Dragstra,

General Director, WageIndicator Foundation


PHOTO: Garments Factory, Bangkok | 1000 Words, Shutterstock | WageIndicator

Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

By Ioannis Ioannou, PhD June 19, 2025
London Business School Professor Ioannis Ioannou, PhD examines the vulnerable narrative infrastructure surrounding ESG. By collaboratively engaging those most affected by ESG transitions—indigenous peoples, workers, young people, small businesses, and communities, particularly in the Global South—we can foster the trust, legitimacy, and collective commitment for meaningful progress. Who Gets to Tell the Story of ESG? For more than a decade, ESG rapidly evolved from a specialized investor consideration into an elaborate global infrastructure of standards, metrics, taxonomies, and disclosure frameworks. Investor attention soared, corporate sustainability teams grew exponentially, and ESG vocabulary— climate risk, fiduciary duty, and double materiality—became firmly embedded in corporate boardrooms and regulatory discussions globally. Yet, despite ESG’s impressive institutional and technical advancements, the narrative meant to support it remained remarkably fragile. While ESG developed sophisticated standards, disclosures, and metrics, it never invested in the narrative infrastructure to explain its purpose, build public understanding, or secure legitimacy beyond institutional circles. Without the broader stakeholder engagement and effective storytelling that would connect ESG to people’s lived realities, it became vulnerable. Critics didn’t need to challenge carbon accounting or materiality frameworks; instead, they recast ESG as a job killer, an elite agenda, or an unwelcome intrusion into everyday life. The backlash caught many ESG professionals off guard, though the warning signs were visible. ESG’s rapid adoption by investors and regulatory bodies created an illusion of momentum, but this obscured a deeper structural gap. ESG rarely connected meaningfully with those directly affected by ESG-driven transitions—workers facing disruption, small business owners adapting to shifting expectations, and communities, particularly in vulnerable regions, confronting real and immediate climate risks. For these groups, ESG often seemed abstract, distant, and disconnected from their daily concerns. Narrative infrastructure might sound like an unusual concept, but it's foundational to widespread support. It connects people and institutions, conveys meaning, and determines whether ESG is seen as genuine leadership or merely corporate branding. Robust narrative infrastructure ensures resilience under political pressure; without it, initiatives can rapidly lose whatever public approval they may have had. Constructing narrative infrastructure requires explicitly recognizing storytelling— and who contributes to that storytelling—as integral to ESG strategy, not simply a communications exercise. Effective narratives generate trust precisely because they emerge from transparent dialogue, clear accountability, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. By contrast, greenwashing uses storytelling deceptively, aiming to conceal poor performance, and deflect scrutiny. Strong narrative infrastructure, unlike greenwashing, strengthens credibility and legitimacy by openly connecting ESG commitments to shared realities, tangible actions, and measurable outcomes. It is a fundamental strategic asset for ESG success. Importantly, narrative infrastructure also concerns who gets to tell these stories. Over the last decade, the central narrators of the ESG story have largely been institutional actors: executives, investors, sustainability professionals, academics, and regulators. Their contributions have been invaluable, driven by expertise, rigor, and genuine commitment. Yet these narrators also represent a relatively narrow perspective, shaped by institutional backgrounds and professional incentives. Many important voices have remained largely excluded from shaping ESG narratives: indigenous people whose lives are often fundamentally changed by corporate activities, workers whose livelihoods are directly impacted by ESG transitions, young people deeply invested in future outcomes, small businesses continuously adapting to new ESG-related requirements, and especially communities—particularly in the Global South —directly facing the worst of climate disruptions. While these stakeholders' experiences occasionally appear within ESG reporting, they seldom influenced strategy or shape decisions in a substantial way. This exclusion poses significant, practical risks. Stakeholders naturally resist initiatives perceived as imposed from above or disconnected from their lived realities—not necessarily because they oppose ESG’s goals, but because they feel unheard and invisible within such ESG narratives. The resistance appears as political backlash, active public scepticism, or disengagement, all severely undermining ESG’s legitimacy, effectiveness, and public support. Addressing this critical weakness requires deliberately building ESG’s narrative infrastructure through inclusive, collaborative, and ongoing engagement. Practically, companies should move beyond occasional or reactive consultations toward sustained processes where stakeholders actively shape strategies. This can involve establishing community advisory boards with real decision-making power, participatory scenario planning that integrates diverse local perspectives, and internal cross-functional councils that ensure workers, communities, and youth voices directly influence ESG outcomes. Such sustained, authentic collaboration bridges the gap between institutional intentions and genuine public legitimacy. Within companies, narrative stewardship should not be limited to corporate communications or sustainability departments alone. Effective ESG storytelling depends on regular, structured collaboration across multiple functions—including strategy, human resources, procurement, product development, and finance—to ensure ESG commitments align authentically with core business decisions and reflect real-world stakeholder experiences. Companies can institutionalize this collaboration by creating dedicated cross-functional ESG committees tasked with integrating diverse internal perspectives, monitoring stakeholder feedback, and ensuring ESG initiatives clearly connect to tangible social outcomes. At an institutional level, building ESG narrative infrastructure involves establishing platforms that broaden participation in ESG discourse. It requires supporting initiatives that improve public understanding of ESG standards and practices, funding research that evaluates public perceptions of ESG alongside traditional financial metrics and ensuring ESG disclosures transparently reflect diverse stakeholder concerns. ESG narrative legitimacy grows stronger when diverse perspectives genuinely shape how ESG commitments are determined and communicated, implemented, and monitored—not merely as token inclusions, but as integral, strategic components of ESG itself. Regulators have an essential role in shaping ESG narrative infrastructure. Current ESG disclosure standards typically prioritize technical accuracy and financial materiality, mostly targeting investor needs. Broadening these frameworks to explicitly incorporate public legitimacy could significantly enhance ESG’s impact. For example, regulators could introduce clear criteria assessing whether companies effectively communicate their ESG strategies to diverse stakeholders and evaluate how these communications influence brand value and reputational risk—approaches already emerging in Europe’s Green Claims Directive and the CSRD/ESRS focus on double materiality. Additionally, policy evaluations could systematically measure whether ESG initiatives are genuinely perceived as fair, inclusive, and beneficial by the communities they affect. Public support and trust require deliberate and continuous effort; they cannot be assumed or taken for granted. Fortunately, inspiring examples of effective ESG narrative infrastructure already exist. Companies like Patagonia have openly integrated supplier and worker voices into their ESG narratives, transparently highlighting labour practices and sourcing standards, significantly enhancing their credibility. Unilever’s inclusive “living wage” campaigns have similarly leveraged stories from frontline workers to connect ESG metrics with tangible social outcomes, strengthening stakeholder trust. Industry-specific initiatives, such as the Bangladesh Accord in apparel, demonstrate how authentically incorporating diverse stakeholder experiences—including employees, unions, and community representatives—into ESG reporting can reinforce accountability and legitimacy. These examples highlight how inclusive storytelling, grounded in genuine stakeholder participation, can transform ESG commitments from abstract promises into credible actions with real-world impact. ESG professionals now face an exciting strategic opportunity: intentionally building a narrative infrastructure that's genuinely inclusive, collaborative, and resilient. Yes, involving diverse stakeholders means navigating complexity, dialogue, and occasionally tough compromises. It also means embracing participatory processes that might feel messier or less predictable. But it's exactly this diversity of voices and collective authorship that generates persuasive, robust narratives—ones that not only resonate widely but can confidently withstand shifts in politics, culture, and public sentiment. Beyond strengthening ESG's narrative infrastructure, it's important for ESG professionals to step back and consider sustainability more broadly. By explicitly linking ESG narratives to overarching sustainability objectives—such as respecting planetary boundaries and enabling a just transition—professionals can better illustrate how financial markets, corporate strategies, and policy frameworks actively support broader ecological and social well-being. Making these broader connections explicit can deepen trust, enhance engagement, and ensure the interconnected ESG-sustainability story resonates meaningfully with all those whose futures depend on it. We stand at a turning point, facing a critical opportunity to strengthen ESG’s narrative foundations. While ESG’s narrative fragility has been clearly exposed, this moment also offers an inspiring chance to intentionally build a more inclusive, credible, and resilient narrative infrastructure. The future of sustainability depends not only on rigorous metrics or detailed disclosures, but ultimately on whether those whose lives are impacted recognize themselves clearly in its story. By authentically amplifying diverse voices, explicitly connecting ESG initiatives to broader sustainability goals, and developing narratives rooted in real-world experiences, we can foster the trust, legitimacy, and collective commitment necessary for meaningful and lasting progress.
By Antoinette de Crombrugghe May 15, 2025
I belong to a generation raised in the shadow of the climate crisis. But it wasn’t something we were taught in school. It wasn’t part of our curriculum, our standardized tests, our childhood vocabulary. We came across it slowly, in fragments, through social media, activism, panic headlines, and documentaries. We educated ourselves. We connected the dots. And still, many of us are figuring out how to carry this knowledge and how to live with it without being crushed by it.
PHOTO: Ana Bachurova | Pléneau Island, 65°06.6’S / 064°04.0’W
By Ana Bachurova March 20, 2025
After recent travels in Antarctica, UNEP-FI Energy Efficiency Lead Ana Bachurova, M.Sc., MBA shares learnings and insights into our current environmental realities and how practitioners in sustainable development can advance positive impacts.
More blog posts