I’m Only Six—You Figure it Out!

John Elkington • November 16, 2021

I rarely disagree with Greta Thunberg, but—while she won’t know it—we temporarily parted ways over the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow. Before the event even opened its doors, she had insisted that: "We are tired of [leaders'] blah, blah, blah." And of course I agreed. Later she said that the event was a "PR exercise"—and, again, I agreed. Of course it was. Pretty much everyone we met there was doing PR of some sort.


But then she insisted, before the summit had closed its doors, that COP26 was a "failure.”


Hold on a minute, I thought as I trudged along as part of the rainswept Fridays4Future march she would shortly address. My instant reaction was to conclude: “No! No. 1, it’s too soon to know. And No. 2, COP26 may just have succeeded in opening a window on a very different political landscape.” An unintentional, but critical outcome.



A Place for Youth



COP26, I believe, marked the crossing of a critical psychological threshold, indeed a political threshold, where older people who run—and have often screwed up—the planet are being forced to acknowledge that young people should have a voice. Will have a voice.

The question now is not so much whether, but where, when and how?


But first let’s step back in time to consider how young people fared in earlier stages of our industrial economies. Some days before our CEO and I joined the 100,000 people of all ages at the Climate March, I rode the train to Glasgow. As we sped north, I began reading Jeremy Paxman’s new book on the critical role coal played in Britain’s rise to global power. Fascinating.


Black Gold begins with an early example of the truly awful price that endless mining communities paid in life and limb. The book’s opening pages tell the frightful story of the Hartley mining disaster of 1862. This single catastrophe created 103 widows and left 257 children and 47 dependent adults with no means of support. The ages of the dead ranged from seventy-one down to ten—indeed, a single family lost seven children and teenagers.


Clearly, the Industrial Revolution was no paradise for young people, but perhaps they had it easy in contrast to the future prospects of many young people now alive as the consequences of all the coal, oil, and gas we have burned come home to roost.

It was striking, in fact, how many voices at COP26 were busily heralding the end of coal as a fuel. New agreements unveiled in Glasgow included a pledge signed by 25 countries, including the United States and Canada, to stop public financing of overseas fossil fuel projects by the end of 2022. The UK also unveiled its Global Coal to Clean Power Transition, featuring new commitments from 23 countries, including Poland, South Korea, and Indonesia, to phase out coal power.


One Minute to Midnight



"Today, I think we can say that the end of coal is in sight," said Alok Sharma, President of COP26, but where were the biggest coal-burners, China in particular? Conspicuous by their absence—and busily burning more coal than ever in the midst of the latest energy crisis.


"It's one minute to midnight on that doomsday clock, and we need to act now,“ intoned Britain’s Johnson, no great friend of climate action in the past. “If we don't get serious about climate change today, it will be too late for our children to do so tomorrow." Well-informed people in his audience knew that he was actively considering the first new coal mine in the country since decades.

Dubbed “a clown” by some politicians from other countries, he was soon enmired in yet another “sleaze” scandal, very much of his own making. And his declared, laudable intention of “uniting the world to tackle climate change” proved something of a damp squib—with the presidents of countries like China and Russia, no slouches when it comes to burning fossil fuels, refusing to even show up in Glasgow.


But one theme kept surfacing in my brain as I watched fireworks screech into Glasgow’s night skies for several nights running, first for Diwali, then for Guy Fawkes night. In headlines: the shape of a new and very different political settlement is now beginning to emerge. Yes, in places like New Delhi, with millions of people ignoring firework bans, air pollution monitors literally went off the scale as toxic clouds built up across the region. But, as they say, it often gets darker just before the dawn.


You Figure it Out!




It’s interesting how some major businesses are now picking up on the theme of child eco-anxiety and activism. An Amazon TV ad currently running has young people from around the world encouraging businesses to clean up their act. And one line that still rattles around my brain came from a small boy awed by the scale of what needs to be done to fix all of this: “I’m only six!” he protests. “You figure it out!”


One afternoon, I walked out to the Green Zone in Glasgow’s Science Centre. There I watched a new film, Here We Are, designed to get children thinking about our home planet. Based on a book by Oliver Jeffers, who took the audience through a range of iPad-based drawing exercises during the Apple-sponsored event, the film contained well-rehearsed lines like, “Take care of our planet—it’s the only one we’ve got!” But I was forcefully impressed by the quality of Apple TV+ production—and it seemed the audience was, too.


Bringing Youth on Board



One session I had to miss featured Barack Obama. His key message: "To all the young people out there—I want you to stay angry. I want you to stay frustrated." But he advised global youth, “Channel that anger. Harness that frustration. Keep pushing harder and harder for more and more. Because that's what's required to meet that challenge. Gird yourself for a marathon, not a sprint."


He honoured the dedication of activists such as Greta Thunberg who are "forming movements across borders," and urged young people to get out and vote for politicians who will stand against climate change. "Vote like your life depends on it, because it does," he concluded.

More practically, B Lab UK got together with The Body Shop International to present Boardroom 2030, a new project exploring how youth boards might help business leaders to tap into the very different views, priorities, and wisdom of young people.


The sort of questions being asked: Consider who should have a seat at the table. How can you include your employees and the voices of young people? Looking beyond the bottom line and the year ahead, what topics should be discussed? What should all businesses be discussing in boardrooms in 2030?


I was impressed how Body Shop CEO David Boynton patiently listened to advice that would scarcely have been new to him or his top team—but this was a pilot project, and I came away convinced that this trend can only build over time.


Extreme Youth Hangout


Finally, at least here, I spoke at an event in what was billed as the “Extreme Hangout,” hosted by lawyers Mishcon de Reya on an old ferry—whose decks occasionally rocked as river traffic passed on the Clyde. This was part of the youth fringe for COP26.

And the rocking of the decks was a timely reminder of the seismic shifts that will impact our politics and economies as young people move into the mainstream—creating very different currents, tributaries, and estuaries.


As Alex Rhodes, Head of Mishcon Purpose, explained, “Globally, young people are the most impacted by climate change, yet they are the least enfranchised. Working with One Young World and the Democracy and Culture Foundation, [Mishcon] have held The Global Youth Climate Inquiry, hearing evidence from global youth leaders on how climate change is impacting them and understanding how they can be better enfranchised in decision-making and action taking.”


Having taken part in the inquiry, I was delighted to be invited to take part in an “Extreme Youth Hangout” panel discussion focusing on the question of how we bring young people into the decision-making process that will profoundly impact their futures.

As it happens, another of the books I had been reading on the train a few days earlier was Generations by Bobby Duffy. Early on in the book he notes that, throughout history, “tumultuous times awaken generational awareness.”


What with the malign effects of the pandemic prefiguring the coming impact of the climate and biodiversity emergencies, young people are growing up in a world that could radicalize them to the point of chaos, or help build their characters and commitment to solving great challenges in the same way the Second World War did for many who took part.


A Future that Works for the Young—Of All Species



We face intergenerational challenges that require us to evolve intergenerational solutions, including radically different politics and economics. The battle now is to create a world that is fit for the young of all people—and all species.


In his summary of a Federated Hermes event where I also spoke, the investment firm’s international CEO, Saker Nusseibeh, encouraged his audience to come up with courageous ambitions to drive future progress.


After Glasgow my own commitment to helping younger people, as the closest proxies we have for the future generations that have long been central to the sustainability agenda, has only grown.


PHOTO: John Elkington | COP26 Climate March, 6 November 2021


About the Author:

John Elkington
Founder & Chief Pollinator, Volans Ventures
ISSP Sustainability Hall of Fame Honoree

Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

By Ioannis Ioannou, PhD June 19, 2025
London Business School Professor Ioannis Ioannou, PhD examines the vulnerable narrative infrastructure surrounding ESG. By collaboratively engaging those most affected by ESG transitions—indigenous peoples, workers, young people, small businesses, and communities, particularly in the Global South—we can foster the trust, legitimacy, and collective commitment for meaningful progress. Who Gets to Tell the Story of ESG? For more than a decade, ESG rapidly evolved from a specialized investor consideration into an elaborate global infrastructure of standards, metrics, taxonomies, and disclosure frameworks. Investor attention soared, corporate sustainability teams grew exponentially, and ESG vocabulary— climate risk, fiduciary duty, and double materiality—became firmly embedded in corporate boardrooms and regulatory discussions globally. Yet, despite ESG’s impressive institutional and technical advancements, the narrative meant to support it remained remarkably fragile. While ESG developed sophisticated standards, disclosures, and metrics, it never invested in the narrative infrastructure to explain its purpose, build public understanding, or secure legitimacy beyond institutional circles. Without the broader stakeholder engagement and effective storytelling that would connect ESG to people’s lived realities, it became vulnerable. Critics didn’t need to challenge carbon accounting or materiality frameworks; instead, they recast ESG as a job killer, an elite agenda, or an unwelcome intrusion into everyday life. The backlash caught many ESG professionals off guard, though the warning signs were visible. ESG’s rapid adoption by investors and regulatory bodies created an illusion of momentum, but this obscured a deeper structural gap. ESG rarely connected meaningfully with those directly affected by ESG-driven transitions—workers facing disruption, small business owners adapting to shifting expectations, and communities, particularly in vulnerable regions, confronting real and immediate climate risks. For these groups, ESG often seemed abstract, distant, and disconnected from their daily concerns. Narrative infrastructure might sound like an unusual concept, but it's foundational to widespread support. It connects people and institutions, conveys meaning, and determines whether ESG is seen as genuine leadership or merely corporate branding. Robust narrative infrastructure ensures resilience under political pressure; without it, initiatives can rapidly lose whatever public approval they may have had. Constructing narrative infrastructure requires explicitly recognizing storytelling— and who contributes to that storytelling—as integral to ESG strategy, not simply a communications exercise. Effective narratives generate trust precisely because they emerge from transparent dialogue, clear accountability, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. By contrast, greenwashing uses storytelling deceptively, aiming to conceal poor performance, and deflect scrutiny. Strong narrative infrastructure, unlike greenwashing, strengthens credibility and legitimacy by openly connecting ESG commitments to shared realities, tangible actions, and measurable outcomes. It is a fundamental strategic asset for ESG success. Importantly, narrative infrastructure also concerns who gets to tell these stories. Over the last decade, the central narrators of the ESG story have largely been institutional actors: executives, investors, sustainability professionals, academics, and regulators. Their contributions have been invaluable, driven by expertise, rigor, and genuine commitment. Yet these narrators also represent a relatively narrow perspective, shaped by institutional backgrounds and professional incentives. Many important voices have remained largely excluded from shaping ESG narratives: indigenous people whose lives are often fundamentally changed by corporate activities, workers whose livelihoods are directly impacted by ESG transitions, young people deeply invested in future outcomes, small businesses continuously adapting to new ESG-related requirements, and especially communities—particularly in the Global South —directly facing the worst of climate disruptions. While these stakeholders' experiences occasionally appear within ESG reporting, they seldom influenced strategy or shape decisions in a substantial way. This exclusion poses significant, practical risks. Stakeholders naturally resist initiatives perceived as imposed from above or disconnected from their lived realities—not necessarily because they oppose ESG’s goals, but because they feel unheard and invisible within such ESG narratives. The resistance appears as political backlash, active public scepticism, or disengagement, all severely undermining ESG’s legitimacy, effectiveness, and public support. Addressing this critical weakness requires deliberately building ESG’s narrative infrastructure through inclusive, collaborative, and ongoing engagement. Practically, companies should move beyond occasional or reactive consultations toward sustained processes where stakeholders actively shape strategies. This can involve establishing community advisory boards with real decision-making power, participatory scenario planning that integrates diverse local perspectives, and internal cross-functional councils that ensure workers, communities, and youth voices directly influence ESG outcomes. Such sustained, authentic collaboration bridges the gap between institutional intentions and genuine public legitimacy. Within companies, narrative stewardship should not be limited to corporate communications or sustainability departments alone. Effective ESG storytelling depends on regular, structured collaboration across multiple functions—including strategy, human resources, procurement, product development, and finance—to ensure ESG commitments align authentically with core business decisions and reflect real-world stakeholder experiences. Companies can institutionalize this collaboration by creating dedicated cross-functional ESG committees tasked with integrating diverse internal perspectives, monitoring stakeholder feedback, and ensuring ESG initiatives clearly connect to tangible social outcomes. At an institutional level, building ESG narrative infrastructure involves establishing platforms that broaden participation in ESG discourse. It requires supporting initiatives that improve public understanding of ESG standards and practices, funding research that evaluates public perceptions of ESG alongside traditional financial metrics and ensuring ESG disclosures transparently reflect diverse stakeholder concerns. ESG narrative legitimacy grows stronger when diverse perspectives genuinely shape how ESG commitments are determined and communicated, implemented, and monitored—not merely as token inclusions, but as integral, strategic components of ESG itself. Regulators have an essential role in shaping ESG narrative infrastructure. Current ESG disclosure standards typically prioritize technical accuracy and financial materiality, mostly targeting investor needs. Broadening these frameworks to explicitly incorporate public legitimacy could significantly enhance ESG’s impact. For example, regulators could introduce clear criteria assessing whether companies effectively communicate their ESG strategies to diverse stakeholders and evaluate how these communications influence brand value and reputational risk—approaches already emerging in Europe’s Green Claims Directive and the CSRD/ESRS focus on double materiality. Additionally, policy evaluations could systematically measure whether ESG initiatives are genuinely perceived as fair, inclusive, and beneficial by the communities they affect. Public support and trust require deliberate and continuous effort; they cannot be assumed or taken for granted. Fortunately, inspiring examples of effective ESG narrative infrastructure already exist. Companies like Patagonia have openly integrated supplier and worker voices into their ESG narratives, transparently highlighting labour practices and sourcing standards, significantly enhancing their credibility. Unilever’s inclusive “living wage” campaigns have similarly leveraged stories from frontline workers to connect ESG metrics with tangible social outcomes, strengthening stakeholder trust. Industry-specific initiatives, such as the Bangladesh Accord in apparel, demonstrate how authentically incorporating diverse stakeholder experiences—including employees, unions, and community representatives—into ESG reporting can reinforce accountability and legitimacy. These examples highlight how inclusive storytelling, grounded in genuine stakeholder participation, can transform ESG commitments from abstract promises into credible actions with real-world impact. ESG professionals now face an exciting strategic opportunity: intentionally building a narrative infrastructure that's genuinely inclusive, collaborative, and resilient. Yes, involving diverse stakeholders means navigating complexity, dialogue, and occasionally tough compromises. It also means embracing participatory processes that might feel messier or less predictable. But it's exactly this diversity of voices and collective authorship that generates persuasive, robust narratives—ones that not only resonate widely but can confidently withstand shifts in politics, culture, and public sentiment. Beyond strengthening ESG's narrative infrastructure, it's important for ESG professionals to step back and consider sustainability more broadly. By explicitly linking ESG narratives to overarching sustainability objectives—such as respecting planetary boundaries and enabling a just transition—professionals can better illustrate how financial markets, corporate strategies, and policy frameworks actively support broader ecological and social well-being. Making these broader connections explicit can deepen trust, enhance engagement, and ensure the interconnected ESG-sustainability story resonates meaningfully with all those whose futures depend on it. We stand at a turning point, facing a critical opportunity to strengthen ESG’s narrative foundations. While ESG’s narrative fragility has been clearly exposed, this moment also offers an inspiring chance to intentionally build a more inclusive, credible, and resilient narrative infrastructure. The future of sustainability depends not only on rigorous metrics or detailed disclosures, but ultimately on whether those whose lives are impacted recognize themselves clearly in its story. By authentically amplifying diverse voices, explicitly connecting ESG initiatives to broader sustainability goals, and developing narratives rooted in real-world experiences, we can foster the trust, legitimacy, and collective commitment necessary for meaningful and lasting progress.
By Antoinette de Crombrugghe May 15, 2025
I belong to a generation raised in the shadow of the climate crisis. But it wasn’t something we were taught in school. It wasn’t part of our curriculum, our standardized tests, our childhood vocabulary. We came across it slowly, in fragments, through social media, activism, panic headlines, and documentaries. We educated ourselves. We connected the dots. And still, many of us are figuring out how to carry this knowledge and how to live with it without being crushed by it.
PHOTO: Ana Bachurova | Pléneau Island, 65°06.6’S / 064°04.0’W
By Ana Bachurova March 20, 2025
After recent travels in Antarctica, UNEP-FI Energy Efficiency Lead Ana Bachurova, M.Sc., MBA shares learnings and insights into our current environmental realities and how practitioners in sustainable development can advance positive impacts.
More blog posts