What’s the Story on the Rights of Humans?

Liz Stern • December 15, 2021

Human rights are rights we all have because we exist, we live, we breathe. They are not given by a state or religion or other body of power. They are inherent and universal to us all, regardless of nationality, gender, ethnicity, religious practices, color, or any other label and have been codified in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Human rights range from the most basic—food, education, health, housing, work, the right to live, and liberty—to the right to choose how one participates in and is entitled to that realization for their dignity. These fundamental rights push back against the concept of the “other.” As long as we are alive, we share this world, we blend.


These rights and how they are enacted are supported by Eleanor Roosevelt’s remarks at the Tenth Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights held at U.N. Headquarters in 1958. Having served as the first Chair of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights, she acknowledges that we must all strive to ensure that these rights are available to all. She states that the work starts at very intimate levels:

“Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home — so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. [...] Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerted citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world.”

— Eleanor Roosevelt, United Nations, 1958


Who is the other?

In a time of discord and division, it can seem all too easy to blame or focus on “otherness” as the root of our difficulties. What box do people want to put me in? There have been times of unity between Muslims, Christians, Jews, people whose skin might be some shade of black, brown, red, yellow, or white, where harmonious interaction and life side by side created the opportunity for growth in civilization. Sadly, today few of our societies emulate that perspective. Too often, we allow deep fear to serve as our guide. Much of our world population cannot “see” the other and, out of “other” fear, we choose to dehumanize those who seem different. That allows us to treat people as a detached number, it allows us to not feel pain when “the other” is erased, all because they seem to be different from us.


Let’s reset and get to know each other

In my work as a consultant on legacy development and philanthropy, and as a board member for Refugees International and Advisory board member for the Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities, the rights of humans are always at the forefront of my attention. For example, when the work is in respect of financial resources for the underserved, the first questions that arise are: who, what and how will financial resources for the underserved be accessed? Who will direct those opportunities? If the work is around food security, the same question will arise. The narrative becomes a dilemma of causality: who has the right to access food and who controls the access to something as fundamental as food. If you are hungry, you may also be ill and unable to participate in education options, economic activity. What has happened to the human rights of those affected?

As a result, I have become invested in and intertwined with human rights and inequality reduction. How we choose, as professionals in sustainability, to support the rights of those impacted may need to be re-evaluated or changed up to reignite options and opportunities. Going back to Eleanor Roosevelt, it starts in small places. It is how we chose to treat each other, how we participate. In a presentation and discussion by a group of thought leaders from a variety of fields in 2019, I came to appreciate how human rights are not a zero-sum game. As one participant stated, no one loses their rights when everyone else has theirs. However, it is easy to fall into the quagmire of which right has privilege over another. A new social contract is needed so that individuals and communities can imagine coming together, working together, helping each other in times of need or plenty, and sharing the same environment for the benefit of all, prioritizing their communal needs. 


The value of personal narrative

Sharing our personal stories or narrative allows us to find places of connection and shared interest, thereby taking away the fear of the unknown and allowing reflection on the path ahead. In all the work that one may do to further human rights, the telling of stories can guide how we might navigate or pivot with respect to implications and challenges of choosing civil and political rights over economic, social, and cultural rights, for example. Stories allow us to connect at deep levels and share commonalities, creating new relationships, connecting communities and perspectives. In my journey, I talk to people on the subways of New York, because I want to know their stories. A compliment on a pair of shoes gave me a gift. With enthusiasm, the wearer told me that her shoes were originally her wedding shoes in Pakistan. Each wearing, she is reminded of her home in Pakistan and what she has created in New York, her journey—first as a refugee, now as a teacher. The shoes remind her of the rights she has now versus those denied her in her home country, and she relayed that she will go back if she feels she would be able to participate safely as she does in New York. This exchange was a reminder for me of the importance of work in human rights.


What you can do today

As you consider Human Rights Day this year, consider one thing you could do that would have a positive impact on one person, or reflect on what you would be willing to give up to allow someone else to experience a better life. Sometimes we are so deeply connected to the work we lead that we lose sight of cognitive biases or of small opportunities around us that can lead to more impactful insights and results. Take a few moments to reflect on your work, put yourself in the shoes of others and imagine their lives from another vantage and how your efforts support beneficial changes in their life. Engage your colleagues, their perspectives are likely to be different, even if nuanced.  Would you change anything you do in order to make one person’s life better, today, this week, this month, this quarter, this year? Each small act of kindness, compassion, and empathy begets another and brings us closer to realizing the rights of others.


We all live our lives within the parameters we grow up with and what we have experienced, with what we chose to keep and what we chose to discard. Are you religious or not, carnivore or not, wealthy or not, of color or not? Using such designations allows us to separate and believe we have nothing in common with each other. Fundamentally, regardless of where we live, we all want the same things in life: to participate in our lives, that of our families and our community and the larger world; to be able to care for ourselves and for our families, to feel safe and loved, to be able to live with ourselves. Our journeys may be different, yet where we end up is much the same place.


Enabling human rights is essential to creating sustainable development opportunities across the globe. The lack of access to basic rights and resources impedes populations' economic participation. And the lack of economic possibilities hampers access to the basics that sustain healthy communities. It feels a little like the chicken and the egg conundrum. By staying people-focused we have the opportunity to create the change we seek, inclusive of all the rights of humans while re-imagining development.


PHOTO: Radek Homola | Unsplash | Deserted refugee camp in Calais, France


About the Author:

Liz Stern
Board Member, Refugees International
Advisory Board Member, Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities

Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

By Ioannis Ioannou, PhD June 19, 2025
London Business School Professor Ioannis Ioannou, PhD examines the vulnerable narrative infrastructure surrounding ESG. By collaboratively engaging those most affected by ESG transitions—indigenous peoples, workers, young people, small businesses, and communities, particularly in the Global South—we can foster the trust, legitimacy, and collective commitment for meaningful progress. Who Gets to Tell the Story of ESG? For more than a decade, ESG rapidly evolved from a specialized investor consideration into an elaborate global infrastructure of standards, metrics, taxonomies, and disclosure frameworks. Investor attention soared, corporate sustainability teams grew exponentially, and ESG vocabulary— climate risk, fiduciary duty, and double materiality—became firmly embedded in corporate boardrooms and regulatory discussions globally. Yet, despite ESG’s impressive institutional and technical advancements, the narrative meant to support it remained remarkably fragile. While ESG developed sophisticated standards, disclosures, and metrics, it never invested in the narrative infrastructure to explain its purpose, build public understanding, or secure legitimacy beyond institutional circles. Without the broader stakeholder engagement and effective storytelling that would connect ESG to people’s lived realities, it became vulnerable. Critics didn’t need to challenge carbon accounting or materiality frameworks; instead, they recast ESG as a job killer, an elite agenda, or an unwelcome intrusion into everyday life. The backlash caught many ESG professionals off guard, though the warning signs were visible. ESG’s rapid adoption by investors and regulatory bodies created an illusion of momentum, but this obscured a deeper structural gap. ESG rarely connected meaningfully with those directly affected by ESG-driven transitions—workers facing disruption, small business owners adapting to shifting expectations, and communities, particularly in vulnerable regions, confronting real and immediate climate risks. For these groups, ESG often seemed abstract, distant, and disconnected from their daily concerns. Narrative infrastructure might sound like an unusual concept, but it's foundational to widespread support. It connects people and institutions, conveys meaning, and determines whether ESG is seen as genuine leadership or merely corporate branding. Robust narrative infrastructure ensures resilience under political pressure; without it, initiatives can rapidly lose whatever public approval they may have had. Constructing narrative infrastructure requires explicitly recognizing storytelling— and who contributes to that storytelling—as integral to ESG strategy, not simply a communications exercise. Effective narratives generate trust precisely because they emerge from transparent dialogue, clear accountability, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. By contrast, greenwashing uses storytelling deceptively, aiming to conceal poor performance, and deflect scrutiny. Strong narrative infrastructure, unlike greenwashing, strengthens credibility and legitimacy by openly connecting ESG commitments to shared realities, tangible actions, and measurable outcomes. It is a fundamental strategic asset for ESG success. Importantly, narrative infrastructure also concerns who gets to tell these stories. Over the last decade, the central narrators of the ESG story have largely been institutional actors: executives, investors, sustainability professionals, academics, and regulators. Their contributions have been invaluable, driven by expertise, rigor, and genuine commitment. Yet these narrators also represent a relatively narrow perspective, shaped by institutional backgrounds and professional incentives. Many important voices have remained largely excluded from shaping ESG narratives: indigenous people whose lives are often fundamentally changed by corporate activities, workers whose livelihoods are directly impacted by ESG transitions, young people deeply invested in future outcomes, small businesses continuously adapting to new ESG-related requirements, and especially communities—particularly in the Global South —directly facing the worst of climate disruptions. While these stakeholders' experiences occasionally appear within ESG reporting, they seldom influenced strategy or shape decisions in a substantial way. This exclusion poses significant, practical risks. Stakeholders naturally resist initiatives perceived as imposed from above or disconnected from their lived realities—not necessarily because they oppose ESG’s goals, but because they feel unheard and invisible within such ESG narratives. The resistance appears as political backlash, active public scepticism, or disengagement, all severely undermining ESG’s legitimacy, effectiveness, and public support. Addressing this critical weakness requires deliberately building ESG’s narrative infrastructure through inclusive, collaborative, and ongoing engagement. Practically, companies should move beyond occasional or reactive consultations toward sustained processes where stakeholders actively shape strategies. This can involve establishing community advisory boards with real decision-making power, participatory scenario planning that integrates diverse local perspectives, and internal cross-functional councils that ensure workers, communities, and youth voices directly influence ESG outcomes. Such sustained, authentic collaboration bridges the gap between institutional intentions and genuine public legitimacy. Within companies, narrative stewardship should not be limited to corporate communications or sustainability departments alone. Effective ESG storytelling depends on regular, structured collaboration across multiple functions—including strategy, human resources, procurement, product development, and finance—to ensure ESG commitments align authentically with core business decisions and reflect real-world stakeholder experiences. Companies can institutionalize this collaboration by creating dedicated cross-functional ESG committees tasked with integrating diverse internal perspectives, monitoring stakeholder feedback, and ensuring ESG initiatives clearly connect to tangible social outcomes. At an institutional level, building ESG narrative infrastructure involves establishing platforms that broaden participation in ESG discourse. It requires supporting initiatives that improve public understanding of ESG standards and practices, funding research that evaluates public perceptions of ESG alongside traditional financial metrics and ensuring ESG disclosures transparently reflect diverse stakeholder concerns. ESG narrative legitimacy grows stronger when diverse perspectives genuinely shape how ESG commitments are determined and communicated, implemented, and monitored—not merely as token inclusions, but as integral, strategic components of ESG itself. Regulators have an essential role in shaping ESG narrative infrastructure. Current ESG disclosure standards typically prioritize technical accuracy and financial materiality, mostly targeting investor needs. Broadening these frameworks to explicitly incorporate public legitimacy could significantly enhance ESG’s impact. For example, regulators could introduce clear criteria assessing whether companies effectively communicate their ESG strategies to diverse stakeholders and evaluate how these communications influence brand value and reputational risk—approaches already emerging in Europe’s Green Claims Directive and the CSRD/ESRS focus on double materiality. Additionally, policy evaluations could systematically measure whether ESG initiatives are genuinely perceived as fair, inclusive, and beneficial by the communities they affect. Public support and trust require deliberate and continuous effort; they cannot be assumed or taken for granted. Fortunately, inspiring examples of effective ESG narrative infrastructure already exist. Companies like Patagonia have openly integrated supplier and worker voices into their ESG narratives, transparently highlighting labour practices and sourcing standards, significantly enhancing their credibility. Unilever’s inclusive “living wage” campaigns have similarly leveraged stories from frontline workers to connect ESG metrics with tangible social outcomes, strengthening stakeholder trust. Industry-specific initiatives, such as the Bangladesh Accord in apparel, demonstrate how authentically incorporating diverse stakeholder experiences—including employees, unions, and community representatives—into ESG reporting can reinforce accountability and legitimacy. These examples highlight how inclusive storytelling, grounded in genuine stakeholder participation, can transform ESG commitments from abstract promises into credible actions with real-world impact. ESG professionals now face an exciting strategic opportunity: intentionally building a narrative infrastructure that's genuinely inclusive, collaborative, and resilient. Yes, involving diverse stakeholders means navigating complexity, dialogue, and occasionally tough compromises. It also means embracing participatory processes that might feel messier or less predictable. But it's exactly this diversity of voices and collective authorship that generates persuasive, robust narratives—ones that not only resonate widely but can confidently withstand shifts in politics, culture, and public sentiment. Beyond strengthening ESG's narrative infrastructure, it's important for ESG professionals to step back and consider sustainability more broadly. By explicitly linking ESG narratives to overarching sustainability objectives—such as respecting planetary boundaries and enabling a just transition—professionals can better illustrate how financial markets, corporate strategies, and policy frameworks actively support broader ecological and social well-being. Making these broader connections explicit can deepen trust, enhance engagement, and ensure the interconnected ESG-sustainability story resonates meaningfully with all those whose futures depend on it. We stand at a turning point, facing a critical opportunity to strengthen ESG’s narrative foundations. While ESG’s narrative fragility has been clearly exposed, this moment also offers an inspiring chance to intentionally build a more inclusive, credible, and resilient narrative infrastructure. The future of sustainability depends not only on rigorous metrics or detailed disclosures, but ultimately on whether those whose lives are impacted recognize themselves clearly in its story. By authentically amplifying diverse voices, explicitly connecting ESG initiatives to broader sustainability goals, and developing narratives rooted in real-world experiences, we can foster the trust, legitimacy, and collective commitment necessary for meaningful and lasting progress.
By Antoinette de Crombrugghe May 15, 2025
I belong to a generation raised in the shadow of the climate crisis. But it wasn’t something we were taught in school. It wasn’t part of our curriculum, our standardized tests, our childhood vocabulary. We came across it slowly, in fragments, through social media, activism, panic headlines, and documentaries. We educated ourselves. We connected the dots. And still, many of us are figuring out how to carry this knowledge and how to live with it without being crushed by it.
PHOTO: Ana Bachurova | Pléneau Island, 65°06.6’S / 064°04.0’W
By Ana Bachurova March 20, 2025
After recent travels in Antarctica, UNEP-FI Energy Efficiency Lead Ana Bachurova, M.Sc., MBA shares learnings and insights into our current environmental realities and how practitioners in sustainable development can advance positive impacts.
More blog posts