Climate Risks in US Real Estate: A Looming Economic Downturn Despite Political Denial

Arnaud Brohé

Arnaud Brohé, PhD, the founder & CEO of Agendi, signals the increasing risks of climate change in the US real estate market. If left unaddressed, these risks carry significant economic and social consequences, endangering the wellbeing of families and communities across the country.


I’ve spent years analyzing the intersection of climate change and its impacts on various sectors across markets. One thing is clear: the risks to the US real estate market from climate change are real, material, and already undermining the economic foundation many Americans depend on. Despite political denial, the US housing market, particularly in areas vulnerable to climate disasters, is facing crisis. Home insurance, crucial for securing mortgages, is becoming unaffordable, setting the stage for a broader economic disruption.


 

Climate change and the home insurance crisis


In 2021, the Biden administration tasked the US Treasury Department to assess the climate risks to home insurance. Their findings were stark: climate change is making home insurance more expensive and harder to obtain.


This is a critical issue that we’ve been highlighting for years with our financial and real estate clients. Without insurance, banks won’t issue mortgages. As insurers pull back from those geographic areas most at risk, home values in disaster-prone regions will likely plummet, threatening a potential economic downturn.


Political back-and-forth only complicates the situation. Just days after the US Treasury Department’s report was issued, President Donald Trump revoked the executive order that would have required annual assessments of climate risks in the real estate sector. Back-and-forth actions between administrations are frustrating, to say the least. These policies — ranging from flood risk regulations to federal divestment in high-risk zones — are critical for long-term planning and mitigation.


 

Rising insurance costs and the domino effect


One immediate effect of climate change is the sharp increase in real estate insurance premiums. Since 2019, US premiums have risen 31%, with much higher increases in vulnerable areas. In Miami, insurance rates could quadruple, while Sacramento could see a doubling. These rates now outpace inflation, and owning US property is no longer the stable investment it once was.


Insurers in the US have long underpriced climate risks, especially in coastal and fire-prone zones, allowing people to live in increasingly unsafe areas. As insurers adjust rates to reflect those risks, the economic consequences are becoming clear.


 

The socioeconomic implications of a changing housing market: climate migration


Real estate represents nearly $50 trillion of wealth in the US — almost double the country’s GDP. Climate risks are already causing ripple effects. As insurance premiums rise and insurers pull out of high-risk areas, property values could decline, forcing families out and triggering significant economic damage.


According to First Street’s research, over 55 million Americans may migrate within the next 30 years due to climate risks. As people flee high-risk areas like parts of Florida, California and Texas, safer regions may see rising property values while disaster-prone areas experience declines, creating an even greater divide between climate “haves” and “have-nots.”


Without addressing climate risks, we are on the verge of an economic downturn and increasing wealth disparity. Homeownership, once the cornerstone of the American economy, is at risk. If home values drop due to rising insurance costs and climate disasters, the wealth of millions will be wiped out, leading to financial instability.



 

Opportunities amidst risks


However, amidst these challenges, there are opportunities. By focusing on climate resilience, the building sector can create value through sustainable construction practices, adaptation measures, and energy-efficient retrofits. Builders and investors who act proactively to mitigate climate risks can benefit from rising demand for safer, energy-efficient homes. Local regulatory policy such as New York City's Local Law 97 is a step in the right direction: driving energy efficiency and resilience, which ultimately provide financial opportunities for those adapting early.


Climate change is fundamentally altering the real estate market across the United States. Rising insurance premiums, declining home values, and shifting migration patterns are already impacting the American population. Political denial doesn’t change the facts — the economic consequences are unfolding now. To adapt and mitigate the fallout, action is necessary at the policy level and within the real estate and financial sectors.

About the Author:

Arnaud Brohé, PhD
Founder & CEO, Agendi


PHOTO: Josh Olalde | Houston, TX | Unsplash

Read perspectives from the ISSP blog

By Jacqueline Kerr, PHD May 27, 2026
May 2026 We spend enormous energy telling people what needs to change, and very little time thinking about how change actually happens. Most sustainability efforts inside organizations are built around the individual. Convince the right person. Model the right behavior. Win the argument in the room. And to be fair, that approach gets things moving. Until it doesn't. The real barrier isn't information. It isn't even intent. It's the conditions we create for people to change together. What I'm seeing in the most effective organizations isn't individual champions doing heroic work. It's something more structural: well-designed groups where people shift together, hold each other accountable, and build something that doesn't collapse when one person leaves the room.
By Nitesh Dullabh April 28, 2026
April 2026 I walked away from a recent webinar with a lingering thought: we’ve spent years improving supply chains, but very little time truly rethinking them. Most of the systems we rely on today were built for efficiency - to move goods faster, cheaper, at scale. And to be fair, they’ve done that remarkably well. But they were never designed for the complexity we’re now facing: climate volatility, geopolitical and tariff uncertainty, water stress, soil degradation, and widening inequities across supply chains. So what do we do? We add layers - more audits, more reporting, more standards. Necessary? Yes. Sufficient? Not really. The deeper issue is not performance - it’s creating healthy conditions for design and structure. What I’m seeing instead, and what I believe is the real shift underway, is the move toward regenerative partnerships . Not transactional relationships, but systems of collaboration that are designed to endure, adapt, and regenerate value over time through and with relational relationships. 
By By Amy Hall, MSc, Education Lead, TripleWin Advisory March 23, 2026
March 23, 2026 I spend a lot of time thinking about how we teach sustainability. Not just the what , but the how and why . At TripleWin Advisory , a woman-founded, -owned, and -led sustainability consultancy and registered public benefit company, we believe real progress on circularity requires more than good intentions. It requires practitioners who are genuinely equipped to act. That conviction is what led us to develop two courses now available through ISSP: Cultivate and Mitigate . Both courses have since been adopted by universities and are reaching sustainability students across the country. Knowing what went into building them makes me want to share the story behind each one. Mitigate: Built From Practice, Not Textbooks Mitigate was created from hands-on work with partners tackling one of the most pressing issues in sustainability: food waste. Reducing food waste is consistently ranked among the highest-impact solutions to climate change, and yet it remains one of the most underfunded and under-addressed areas in the field. TripleWin Advisory has worked with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and the Pacific Coast Food Waste Commitment (PCFWC) , a public-private partnership whose frameworks were ultimately adopted at the national level. Those assets, that research, and those hard-won insights form the backbone of Mitigate. When we talk about food waste reduction strategies in this course, we're drawing on frameworks that have been tested and refined in real supply chains and policy environments. For learners who want to do this work professionally, that grounding matters. The University of Wisconsin has integrated Mitigate into their undergraduate and graduate sustainability programs, which speaks to what the course offers academically: rigorous, applied content that bridges the classroom and the field.
More blog posts